負(fù)語(yǔ)用遷移對(duì)中國(guó)英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者道歉策略選擇的影響.pdf

1、西南交通大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文負(fù)語(yǔ)用遷移對(duì)中國(guó)英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者道歉策略選擇的影響姓名：羅飛申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專(zhuān)業(yè)：外國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：王維民20070501西南交通大學(xué)碩士研究生學(xué)位論文第1l頁(yè)Apologyasoneofthespeechacts，hasbeenthesubjectofextensiveresearchinthefieldsofpragmatiesandSoeiolingnistiesNegativepragmatic

2、transferwhichisalwaysconsideredastheprimecauseofpragmaticerrorsandpragmaticfailures，hasattractedmanyresearchers’attentionAlthoughbothnegativepragmatictransferandthespeechactofapologyhavebeenamplydocumentedfewresearchesai

3、mattheinvestigationofnegativepragmatictransferalongwiththespeechactofapologyThisthesis，therefore，focusesOninvestigatinghownegativepragmatictransferaffectstheselectionofapologystrategiesmadebyChineselearnersofEnglishasafo

4、reignlanguage阻learner)byacontrastivestudywiththeselectionofapologystrategiesmadebynativespeakersinordertodetectifthereisanycorrelationbetweennegativepragmatictransferandChineseEFLlearners’selectionofapologystrategiesandt

5、ogivesomeimplicationsforEnglishteachingandlearningTheinstrumentsofthethesisaretwokindsofquestionnairesOneisdiscoursecompletiontest(DCrforshort)inwhich7situationsaredescdbedandtheotherisallassessmentofsuchsocialfactorsass

6、ocialdistance，SOCialpowerseverityofoffenceandobligationofapologyActuallythequestionnairesusedinthisthesisaremadebyJiangZhanhao(2004)In2003，JiangmadeacontrastivestudyonEnglishapologystrategiesusedbyAustraliancollegestuden

7、tsandChinesecollegestudents，whichemphasizedonculturaleffectontheselectionofapologystrategiesSinceinJiang’Sstudytherewfffeonly32validsubjectsofnormativespeakersthesamplesizeofwhichmaynotbelargeenoughtoensuregeneralizablef

8、mdsofChineseEFLlearnersasforthedatausedinthisthesis，thedataofChineseEFLlearnersarecollectedbytheauthorinChengduInstituteofSichuanInternationalStudiesUniversitywhilethedataofnativespeakersarequotedfrom口contrasavestudyOBEn