聾生與聽力正常學生語篇理解過程的認知比較.pdf

1、聾生與昕力正常學生語篇理解過程的認知比較摘要語篇理解已成為心理語言學、認知科學和人工智能等多學科的熱點研究領(lǐng)域。該研究領(lǐng)域?qū)νС€體語篇璦解的個體麓異研究初見端倪，但尚未涉及特殊人群。瀾悉聾生闋讀理解囂難靜零質(zhì)，對特豫教育賽亟待解決的聾生瑟讀困難闖題具肖重要理論和嶷踐意義。在這一背景下，鑲者決定在譖篇層面上比較深入地探索臻生閱讀理解能力低下的認知原因。為此，筆者以當前諉篇理解理論為理論基磷，采靂即對磷究方法與延辯瑟答超蘧法耨結(jié)合，戳瑟攀

2、潺文教毒|秀遺鼓對照組聽力正常學生的標準，在關(guān)注語篇理解研究幼向從文本基面到情境模型轉(zhuǎn)向的基礎(chǔ)上，采取層層濺落鮑范式展開了語言發(fā)展簸全聾學生島聽力正常學嫩語篇理麓邋弦亞成分加工活動移芻疆工效聚鮑認知磁較。論文第一部分為研究背景與蹩體構(gòu)思。筆者系統(tǒng)回顧聽力正常個體謠篇理解和聾個體閱讀研究，指出已有關(guān)于聾人閱讀研究所存在的閥題和未來研究的趨向。在此基礁土，糖出了本磷究整體梅愚。第二部分為系列實驗研究，包括6個實驗。實驗1在限時呈現(xiàn)實驗材料條

3、件下，運用啟動技術(shù)比較7語言發(fā)展旋全聾學生災驗組與低予蒺3個年級孵力正常學生對照經(jīng)在匈子褒征永平上的蕊工模式耪淼王效采。結(jié)條發(fā)褒，實驗綴在句子表征的加工模式上與對照組相腳，但在加工效果上存在顯著差距。實驗2和實驗3采取自定闋讀速度的按鍵反應(yīng)法分別比較了實驗組與對照組在局部連貫承平幫文本弱顯信感闊連接靜整體連貫承平上豹差吳。發(fā)瑰，囂緩被試在囪定閱讀速度的局部連貫水平和文本明照信息間連接的整體連貫水平上的加工模式并無差異。實驗4和實驗S分剮

4、采取按鍵反應(yīng)對法和隈動追蹤法等郄靖毛羿究法麓延時法比較了兩類被試在背景知識參與下文本不同部分因果連接的整體連貫水平上的本論文得到教育都壤箍教育司“十蠢”特殊教育瓣研課題基金填強的資動((200238)AbstractAsafavoredstudyfieldofpsycholinguistics，cognitivesciencesandartificialintelligence，muchaboutdiscoursecomprehensi

5、onremainsunexploredPreliminaryresearchaboutindividualdifferencespertainingtodiscoursecomprehensionhasofferedvaluableclues，butspecialindividuals’differenceinthisrespectkeepsuntouchedIt’Sofgreatpracticalandtheoreticalsigni

6、ficancetodelveintothenatureofdeafstudents’troubleinreadingSOthatwemightsolvethisurgentprobleminspecialeducationfieldsconcemingdeafstudentsThepresentresearchfindsitswayrightheretoexplorecognitivelythereasonswhydeafstudent

7、s’showmeancomprehensioninreadingThepresentauthormainlybasesherpaperontheupdateddiscoursecomprehensiontheoryforacomparisonbetweencarefulsubdivisionsoftheprocessingmodelsandprocessingresultsinreadingofprelingualdeafstudent

8、sandhearingstudentsrespectivelykeepingitinmindthattheresearchisswervingfromtext—basedstudytosituationalmodelsinvestigationMethodologicallytheauthorcombinesonlineresearchandofflinequestion—answering，takingtheaveragereadin

9、gcomprehensionofChinesediscoursestaughtinschoolastheselectivestandardsforhearingcontrolgroupTheinitialpartprovidesaresearchframeworkfoundedonageneralretrospectivestudyaboutdiscoursecomprehensionofhearingstudentsanddeafon

10、esTheauthoralsopointsouttheprospectiveinvestigationdirectionandproblemsconcerningdeafstudents’readinghereThesecondpartiSasix—experimentresearchofwhich也efirstonewithtime—limitedexperimentalmaterials，usesprimetechniquetoco

11、mparetheprocessingmodelandresultsinsentencerepresentationofprelingualdeafstudentsandhearingstudents3gradesbeneathItdemonstratesthatthesameprocessingmodelissharedbythetwogroupsinsentencerepresentation，buttheexperimentgrou

12、pdisplaydistinctdifferencesinprocessingresultsExperiment2and3applyselfpacedpressresponsetechniquetoexplorethevariationofthetwogroupsinlocalcoherenceandglobalcoherenceandfindnosignificantunlikenessTheforthandfifthexperime

13、ntsutilizesuchaspress—responsetechniqueandeye—trackingmethodaswellastheofflineofcomprehensionquestionsansweringin麗attempttodistinguishthetwogroups’processingmodelsandabilitiesinglobalcoherencewithbackgroundknowledge，thei