版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、外文翻譯CpateSocialResponsibility:AConsumerPerspectiveMaterialSource:AdvancesinConsumerResearch?2004Auth:JillG.KleinCpateSocialResponsibility(CSR)hasemergedinrecentyearsasbothanimptantacademicconstructapressingcpateagendaite
2、m.FirmshavebeenfoundtoengageinsociallyResponsiblebehavisnotonlytofulfillexternalobligationssuchasregulatycompliancestakeholderdemsbutalsoduetoenlightenedselfinterestconsiderationssuchasincreasedcompetitivenessimprovedsto
3、ckmarketperfmancee.g.Drumwright1994Waddock1996Smith2000).GrowinginterestinCSRhassparkednewresearchwithinmarketingontheeffectsofCSRonconsumers(e.g.BrownDacin1997Sen.Bhattaya2001).Inthissessionwepresentthreepapersthataddre
4、ssakeyissuerelatedtothetopicofCSR:theimpactofafirm’sCSRactivitiesonconsumerjudgmentsoftheproductsbrsofthefirm.TheresearchpresentedheregoesbeyondthefewinitialstudieswithinmarketingonCSRbytryingtoundersttheconditionsunderw
5、hichproductjudgmentsareaffectedbyCSRperceptions.ThefirstpaperbyCBBhattayaShankarSen.recognizesthatourcurrentmeasurementsoftheeffectsofCSRareunderdeveloped.Theypresentaframewkfmeasuringtheeffectivenessofafirm’ssocialiniti
6、atives.Indoingsotheyconceptuallydistinguishingsocialinitiativesfromthetraditionalmarketingmix(e.g.bradvertising).FurthertheyfocusonthepotentiallymultifacetedimpactoftheCSRactivities:beyondthe“primary”impactonthebrcompany
7、tothe“secondary”outcomesrelatedtopartnerganizations(e.g.Nonprofits)aswellasthecauseissuepromotedbythecompany.Afirm’seconomicbenefitsfromCSRhavebeendocumentedinthelinktoconsumers’positiveproductbrevaluationsbrchoicebrreco
8、mmendations(BrownDacin1997Drumwright1994HymanArnold1999Sen.Bhattaya2001).YetexistingresearchhasusuallyfoundCSReffectsonproductjudgmentstobeweakindirect(BrownDacin1997Sen.Bhattaya2001).Oursessionincludestwopapersthatexami
9、nefactsthatoutcomessuchasfinancialperfmanceindicesreputation(e.g.Davenpt2000SimpsonKohers2002).WhatislackinghoweverinboththeypracticearecustomerdrivenmeasuresofCSReffectiveness(theConeRoperstudiesbeingthesoleexception).S
10、incemarketfcesdrivemuchofthemomentumbehindCSRinitiativestakingameaningfulaccuratereadofcustomers’reactionstofirms’CRSinitiativesisfromamanagementperspectiveessential.Inthispaperweadoptacustomercentricviewtoproposeaframew
11、kfmeasuringtheeffectivenessofafirm’ssocialinitiatives.Indoingsowestartbyconceptuallydistinguishingsocialinitiativesfromthetraditionalmarketingmix(e.g.bradvertising).Wecontendunlikepriresearch(e.g.Frankental2001)thatakeyd
12、istinctionbetweenmarketingmixattributesCSRinitiativesliesinthepotentiallymultifacetedimpactofthelatter:beyondthe“primary”impactonthebrcompany(thesphereofmarketingmixmeasurement)CSRinitiativescanalsoinfluence“secondary”ou
13、tcomesrelatedtopartnerganizations(e.g.nonprofits)aswellasthecauseissuepromotedbythecompany.FexamplethecrosssectpartnershipbetweenHomeDepotHabitatfHumanitymaynotonlyinfluencecustomers’perceptionsbehavistowardsHomeDepotits
14、productsbutalsoinfluencedonationvolunteeringbehavitowardsHabitataswellasattitudestowardshousingftheunderprivileged.MeoverthesesecondaryoutcomesofCSRareintegralbutthusfarunconsideredcomponentsofCSReffectiveness.Inlightoft
15、heextantemphasisontheprimaryoutcomes(albeitindifferentcontexts)inthemarketingliteraturewewillpayparticularattentiontothesecondaryoutcomes.OurframewkbasedonpriresearchfocusgroupswillrelatedifferenttypesofCSRinitiatives(e.
16、g.thoseinternaltothefirmvs.thoseexternaltothefirm)toexpectedoutcomesproposebothattitudinalbehavialmeasuresfassessingtheeffectivenessofCSRinitiatives.Weshallconcludewithanempiricalexamplethatillustratestheutilizationofthe
17、measuresinpractice.“TheEffectsofCpateSocialResponsibility(CSR)onThisresearchinvestigatestheeffectsofCpateSocialResponsibility(CSR)onconsumers’productqualityevaluations.WhilemanystudiesintheCSRareashowpositiveeffectsofCSR
18、activitiesonconsumers’companyevaluationspurchaseintentionsitisnotclearwhenhowCSRactivitiesinfluenceproductqualityevaluations.AmongafewstudiesthatinvestigatetheeffectofCSRonproductqualityevaluationsBrownDacin1997suggestth
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 基于利益相關(guān)者理論的企業(yè)社會責(zé)任維度研究——消費者認(rèn)知角度.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任與消費者購買意愿分析
- 消費者視角下的企業(yè)社會責(zé)任研究.pdf
- 消費者視角的企業(yè)社會責(zé)任對消費者信任的影響研究.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任―基于消費者視角的研究綜述
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任項目的消費者感知研究.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任行為與消費者響應(yīng)研究——基于消費者視角的分析.pdf
- 旅游企業(yè)社會責(zé)任履行與消費者購買意愿
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任對消費者購買意愿的影響研究
- 消費者響應(yīng)企業(yè)社會責(zé)任的內(nèi)在機(jī)理研究.pdf
- 確定特征剖面“綠色”消費者一個探測的態(tài)度【外文翻譯】
- 消費者視角下企業(yè)社會責(zé)任實現(xiàn)模型研究.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任對消費者選擇傾向影響研究.pdf
- 消費者在企業(yè)社會責(zé)任實現(xiàn)中的作用研究.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任對消費者購買意向的影響研究.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任對消費者購買意向影響的研究.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任對消費者滿意度的影響.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任對消費者品牌信任的影響研究.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任活動需要“門當(dāng)戶對”嗎-——基于消費者視角對企業(yè)社會責(zé)任活動的實證研究.pdf
- 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任對品牌資產(chǎn)影響研究基于消費者視角
評論
0/150
提交評論