我國法官庭外調(diào)查權(quán)研究.pdf

1、學校編碼：學校編碼：10384分類號分類號學號：學號：200308223UDC碩士學位論文我國法官庭外調(diào)查權(quán)研究我國法官庭外調(diào)查權(quán)研究TheResearchofJudge’sRightofOutofCourtInvestigationinChina徐歆徐歆指導教師姓名：宋方青教授專業(yè)名稱：法律碩士論文提交日期：2006年4月論文答辯時間：2006年月學位授予日期：2006年月答辯委員會主席:評閱人:2006年4月ABSTRACTABST

2、RACTTheJudge’srighttoinvestigateoutsidetheCourtisaveryuniquelegalsystemincontinentallawsystem.Tostudythesystemcancontributestothedevelopmentperfectionofourcriminalprocedure.Thearticlemainlyprovidesapproachesofcomparative

3、analysislogicalreasoningtoresearchthetheeticalpracticalissuesofinvestigationoutofcourtbyjudgesindertoreflectcurrentrelevantlegalsysteminChina.ThearticlestartswiththedefinitionofJudge’srightofOutofCourtInvestigationthende

4、monstratesspecificcontentsofitinversatileaspectsanglesthroughhizontalcomparisonmethodthendiscussesthehistysurveyofthesystemconcludesitshisticalrulesbyverticalcomparisonmethod.Afterthatthearticledeeplyfindsoutitsvalueient

5、ationthroughtwobreakpointsofsubstantivejusticeproceduraljusticeestablishesreconstructionassumptionofthesystem.Thearticleisdividedintofourchaptersasfollows:Chapter1givesageneraldeionofJudge’srightofOutofCourtInvestigation

6、.FirstitconfirmsitscontentsbycomparisonsofregulationsamongcontinentallawsystemcommonlawsystemthesysteminChina.thenitdemonstratesthesysteminaspectsofconditionscopepeculiaritymodeetc.Chapter2analysesthedevelopmenttrackofth

7、esystemfromfeudalinquisitionalproceedingstofunctionalproceedingsconcludestherulesofhisticaldevelopmentofthesystem.Chapter3researchescriminalprocedurevalueintheaspectsofsubstantivejusticeproceduraljustice.Chapter4achieves