被告人最后陳述權(quán)研究.pdf

1、西南政法大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文山“~‘.一~一明，協(xié)‘二卜、備被告人最后陳述權(quán)研究導(dǎo)師作者孫長永教授喻棋火::二00八年四月AbstraCtLaststatementbydefendant15thattheaccused15entitledtofreelyexPresstheirviewsandoPinionswhilethecri而naltrial15toenterthefinalstageofthetrial.Althoughmosteo

2、untrieshavemadeeorresPondingregulation，buttheirtheeticalresearehandjudicialPractieearePessimistic.ThisthesiswillbefocusontheeoneePtandcharaeteristics，thecorresPondingmodelsandlegislativesituation，themacroeeonomieenvironm

3、entandmicro一struetureofthelaststatementbydefendant.Finally，someeorresPondingmeasuresareProPosedonthebasisofinsPeetingtheehina’sjudieialpracticeFourehaPtersareembracedinthisthesisand33.000wordsintotalarewrittenTheintroduc

4、tionofthisthesis15eoneerningthereasonofnegleetingthelaststaternenibydefendantthrougheaseanalysis.Aithesametime，thisPartwillbePointoutthatthelaststate們以entbydefendantcontainsmanyissuesworthexPloring.AndinPractieetherearem

5、anyissuestoberesolvedtoo.50thisrightcontainsalotofresearchvalues.ThefirstehaPter15eonce而ngtheconeePtandcharacteristicsoflaststatementbydefendant.Thenmakeadistinetionbetweenthesimilarrights，ineludingthedebateandtherightto

6、silence.ThesecondPart15eoncemingthemodeloflegislationofthelaststatementofdefendantbyinsPeetinganumberofrePresentativenations.Bylegislationandthetraditionalmodeofconvictionandsentencing，therearegenerallythreedifferentsett

7、ingsofthesystemmodel.Statesinthelegislativestyle，themainstatementandProeeduralsanctionsrulesalsohavegreatdifferenees，andabriefanalysisofthecausesforthedifferenees.ThethirdPart15eoneemingtheareaofmaero一andmiero一twooflasts