刑法司法解釋范式的應然取向——以“秦火火”案為切入點.pdf

1、 內容摘要 作為我國法律適用的重要指南，司法解釋在克服規(guī)范條文的抽象性和模糊性,規(guī)制司法裁量權的行使,確保法制的統(tǒng)一實施,保障個案公正等方面發(fā)揮著巨大的作用。但是，刑法司法解釋與刑法規(guī)范是否實現(xiàn)了體系和內容的無縫對接，司法解釋提供的定罪量刑標準有無操作性，相關標準的提出有無充分的經(jīng)驗基礎和理性依據(jù)，不時引發(fā)理論界和實務界的爭議。近年隨著網(wǎng)絡技術迅速運用社會生活的方方面面，網(wǎng)絡空間的言論自由與他人權益的保護呈現(xiàn)緊張關系，鑒于一些網(wǎng)絡大咖利

2、用網(wǎng)絡平臺發(fā)揮虛假信息，中傷他人，或者興風作浪，散布恐怖信息等行為，屢屢造成嚴重后果，最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院聯(lián)合發(fā)布相關司法解釋，明確要求偵、訴、審部門擇用相關罪名懲罰網(wǎng)絡造謠傳謠，起哄生事等行為。由于解釋以相關信息點擊率、轉發(fā)率為評估危害程度的指標，它的出臺引起了學界的質疑。為此，本文結合對“秦火火”案件的審理分析考察刑事司法解釋與刑法條文的關系，探討規(guī)范性解釋與案例解釋的互補的路徑。 本文共分五個部分：共 26000 字。 第

3、一部分，介紹“秦火火”案件的事實與判決結果。結合該案事實，對應刑法關于誹謗、尋釁滋事等犯罪構成要素，細致分析相關司法解釋對散布行為，散布對象即“虛假信息” ， 微博社交平臺網(wǎng)絡是否屬于公共場所等方面的界定， 從中評估二者的契合度，并觀察分析刑法司法解釋本身存在的問題和不足。 第二部分， 結合本案事實和裁判需要， 基于法律的局限性、 規(guī)范性和語言的模糊性。闡釋規(guī)范必須經(jīng)過解釋的基本原理，展開分析我國刑法與司法解釋的關聯(lián)，由此延伸分析現(xiàn)有司

4、法解釋的不同形式，分析解釋層次及效力，同時根據(jù)傳統(tǒng)時空領域與網(wǎng)絡領域的法律運用的異同，分析傳統(tǒng)罪名用于規(guī)制新領域活動的可行性和有效性。 第三部分，明確跟進相關司法解釋應當秉承的價值依據(jù)。一方面，堅持刑法保護法益的基本立場，分析網(wǎng)絡空間的公共傳播方式的特點，明確國家、政府、民間團體、個人名譽權都應當保護的法益； 另一方面， 堅持刑法的不得已性， 即在可罰的違法性層面，討論刑法介入保護的適當時機與必要的限度。 第四部分， 由本案運用法律及解

5、釋的情形追問我國大陸區(qū)域采取規(guī)范性解釋的歷史Abstract Abstract As an important guide our laws applicable provisions of judicial interpretation in overcoming the normative abstraction and ambiguity, regulation of the exercise of judicial discre

6、tion, to ensure uniform implementation of the rule of law, guarantee justice in such cases has played a huge role. However, the criminal law and judicial interpretation of criminal law norms whether to implement a seamle

7、ss system and content of the conviction and sentencing of judicial interpretation provides standard operational presence or absence, presence or absence of standards proposed sufficient empirical basis and rational basis

8、, from time to time lead to theoretical and controversial practice field. In recent years, with the rapid application of network technology in all aspects of social life, the protection of freedom of expression in cybers

9、pace and the rights of others strained relations, in view of the large number of Internet cafes using the network platform to play false information and slander others, or to stir up trouble, to spread information and ot

10、her acts of terror, often causing serious consequences, the supreme people's Procuratorate jointly issued the relevant judicial interpretation clearly requires investigation, the prosecution, the trial department ass

11、erted related offenses punished network rumors pass rumors, stir trouble and other acts. Due to interpret relevant information CTR, was forwarded to assess the degree of hazard indicators, its introduction raises doubts

12、academia. In this paper, combined with the relationship of the trial, “Qin Huohuo“ case study analysis of the provisions of the criminal law and criminal judicial interpretation, and to explore the path of normative inte

13、rpretation and case type complementary explanation. The main contents include the following five areas: total 26,000 words. The first part describes the facts and the verdict “Qin Huohuo“ case. Combined with the facts of

14、 the case, the corresponding criminal law of defamation, disturb other criminal elements on, a detailed analysis of the relevant judicial interpretations of behavior spread, the object that is spread “false information“,

15、 the micro logging social networking platform whether other aspects of the definition of public places from which to assess both fit and observation and analysis of judicial interpretation of criminal law inherent proble