杜慶芳盜竊案案例分析.pdf

1、原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明：本人所呈交的學(xué)位論文，是在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下獨立進行研究所取得的成果。學(xué)位論文中凡引用他人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或未發(fā)表的成果、數(shù)據(jù)、觀點等，均已明確注明出處。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，不包含任何其他個人或集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的科研成果。對本文的研究成果做出重要貢獻的個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標(biāo)明。本聲明的法律責(zé)任由本人承擔(dān)。論文作者簽名：日期：關(guān)于學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)的聲明本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下所完成的論文及相關(guān)的職務(wù)作品，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)

2、歸屬蘭州大學(xué)。本人完全了解蘭州大學(xué)有關(guān)保存、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，同意學(xué)校保存或向國家有關(guān)部門或機構(gòu)送交論文的紙質(zhì)版和電子版，允許論文被查閱和借閱；本人授權(quán)蘭州大學(xué)可以將本學(xué)位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進行檢索，可以采用任何復(fù)制手段保存和匯編本學(xué)位論文。本人離校后發(fā)表、使用學(xué)位論文或與該論文直接相關(guān)的學(xué)術(shù)論文或成果時，第一署名單位仍然為蘭州大學(xué)。本學(xué)位論文研究內(nèi)容：』仞可以公開口不易公開，已在學(xué)位辦公室辦理保密申請，解密后適用本授

3、權(quán)書。(請在以上選項內(nèi)選擇其中一項打“√“)論文作者簽名：’曼盜矗導(dǎo)師簽名：日日AnalysisofDuQingFang’STheftCaseAbstractnenhasrankedamongthetopofthecrimelistsinquantityfromiudicialpracticalperspectiveAccordingtothestatisticanalysisrevealedbytheMinistryofPubicSe

4、curityoverthedecadefrom1980sto1990saboutthesixtypesofcrime：murderassault，fraud，robberyrapeandtheft，thosesixtypesofcrimehaveaccountedforabout95％amongthetotalcrimesandthethefthasaccountedforabout50％amongthesistypesofcrimeB

5、asedontheanalysisoftheDuQingfangcase，thisarticlefocusesonthepenaltyoftheftbetweenfamilymembersandthetheftofcloserelativesandthereasonwhyoneoftheDuQingfang’StwobehaviorsiSnotheldcriminallyresponsiblewhiletheotheriscondemn

6、edThispaperisdividedintofourpartsThefirstpart，puttingforwardtheproblems，introducestheviewsofdifferentpartsandthemaincontroversialissuesseparatelythatis：thecontroversialiSSUCSaboutthesubstantialaspectsandtheproceduralaspe

7、ctsoftheDuQingfangcase耽edisputeofthesubstantialaspectsofthecaseishowtoidentifythequalityofthecase：whetherthebehaviorofDuQingfangisakindofassertionofherfightswhichshouldnotbecondemnedtopenaltyorakindofmisfeasancewhichshou

8、ldbepunishedTheproceduralissuesfocusonwhythecourttakestheevidencesoftheprosecutorasgroundsratherthedefense’Sevidence，whileboththeprosecutorandthedefensehaveprovidedevidencestokeepuptheirviewsThesecondpartistheanalysisoft

9、heproblemThesubstantialaspectsexpoundtheobject，theobjectiveaspect，thesubjectiveaspectofcriminalconstitutionandwhethertoapplytheInterpretation))oftheSupremeCourtneproceduralaspectsanalyzetheapplicableprincipleofevidencean

10、dtheadmissibleprincipleofevidenceThethirdpartistheconclusionofproblemIanalyzethetwobehaviorsoftheDuQingfangthroughanalyzingtheobject，theobjectiveaspect，thesubjectiveaspect，andtheapplicationofthe((Interpretation))oftheSup

11、remeCourtFinallythebehaviorsofDuQingfangopeningupthecofferinherfamilyaccordwiththe(Interpretation))oftheSupremeCourtAndtheconductofDuQingfangtoopenupthecofferinherparentsinlaw’SfamilyconstitutestheftbecauseitiSinaccordwi

12、ththecriminalconstitutionTheproceduralaspectsanalyzetheverbalevidencesandthephysicalevidencesSOthatitiscorrectthatthecourttakestheproofofprosecutorasgroundThefourthpartisaboutthelegalconsummationofthetheftbetweenfamilyme