版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、海南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文經(jīng)營(yíng)判斷規(guī)則研究姓名:周志珍申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):民商法指導(dǎo)教師:毛衛(wèi)民20060601AbstractCorporategovernance,directorsplayanimportantrole,directorobligationsisthefocusofnationalresearchcompanyAmericancorporategovernancemodelmoreresearchisthesubje
2、ctofnationalresearchpriorities,BusinessJudgmentRule(BJR)whichiStheresearchdirectorontheAmericancorporatelawanentryobligationsHoweverfromBJRtodevelopmentuntilnowhasbeendivorcedfromthestatute,WhetheritsoriginintheUnitedSta
3、tesorthesubsequentintroductionofitsownCorporateLawtothefieldinothercountries,whetherforbusinessjudgmentruleoflawovertheissueTherefore,todaytheBJRinthestatuteWasnotcomplete,aclearexpressionInaddition,thebusinessjudgmentru
4、leanddutiesofdirectorsofthecloserelations,somescholarsofitsconfused,evencompanylawdirectorsofobligationsasBJRofstatuteHoweverthatbothhavelinks,butinfactaretwocompletelydifferentissuesAsajudicialruleofinspectionandinvesti
5、gationtherulesaregenerallyregardedas、theliabilityofdirectorstojudgethe”protectiveumbrella”Courtsin。theprocess,onlytOtheobligationsofdirectors,appropriatenessoftheprocessforreviewoftheform,notdirectorsforthesubsequentdeci
6、sionmakingjudge,butthatthedirectorshadfulfilledtheirobligations,theplaintiffshareholderstooverthrowtheassumptionthatitmustpresentevidence,thecourtwillassumethatthedirectorsfrompersonalliabilityEvidentlythejudgesofdirecto
7、rscaninvokeBJRtoavoidthejudgmentthejudgeisalsofreetoexerciseitsdiscretiontoprocessThereforethenonstatutoryofBJRanddiscretionofjudgesalsobecomeobstaclestoourintroductionoftheruleBusinessJudgmentRuletOthestudycurrentlyinou
8、rcountryarenotmanyForourcountryisstillanewthingsSohere1willbeintroducingfiveparts,studiedForewordmainlywiththepresentstatusquoandthe”CompanyLaw”Mybusinessjudgmentrules,theproposedrulesforourcountrymeaningThefirstpartisan
9、overviewoftheoverallBJRTwoFestivalpresentationSectionIintroducedtherulesoforiginandhistoricalevolutionofthesituationandintroducedtheconceptofdifferentrulesinterpretationsOnthebasisofanalysisofthecharacteristicsandnatureo
10、ftherules,inordertograsptheoverallunderstandingoftherulesAnalysisofthesecondpartofthemainareasoftheAmericancompanyBJRapplicableconditionsandrulesinthecontextofcaseanalysisaffiliatedtransactions,mergersdefenseandthefreque
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 董事經(jīng)營(yíng)判斷規(guī)則研究.pdf
- 經(jīng)營(yíng)判斷規(guī)則的適用研究.pdf
- 經(jīng)營(yíng)判斷規(guī)則在我國(guó)國(guó)企中的適用研究.pdf
- 商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則概述
- 論經(jīng)營(yíng)判斷原則.pdf
- 商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則在我國(guó)的適用研究.pdf
- 論商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則的引進(jìn).pdf
- 論董事的經(jīng)營(yíng)判斷原則.pdf
- 商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則在金融業(yè)的適用研究.pdf
- 農(nóng)地經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)抵押規(guī)則研究.pdf
- 電子沙盤經(jīng)營(yíng)規(guī)則
- 試論商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則在我國(guó)的適用.pdf
- 論商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則在我國(guó)的適用.pdf
- 商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則在國(guó)有企業(yè)中的適用研究.pdf
- 董事注意義務(wù)中商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則的問題研究.pdf
- 歐盟控制經(jīng)營(yíng)者集中規(guī)則研究.pdf
- 論公司法中的商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則.pdf
- erp沙盤模擬經(jīng)營(yíng)規(guī)則
- 影視劇本侵權(quán)的實(shí)質(zhì)性相似判斷規(guī)則研究.pdf
- 美國(guó)公司法上“商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則”之評(píng)介——我國(guó)公司法引入商業(yè)判斷規(guī)則之思考.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論