版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、學(xué)校代碼:10270 分類號(hào): 學(xué)號(hào):142200001 碩 士 學(xué) 位 論 文 丘濬、黃宗羲法思想比較研究 學(xué) 院 : 人 文 與 傳 播 學(xué) 院 專 業(yè) : 法 律 史 研 究 方 向 : 中 國 法 律 思 想 史 研 究生姓名 : 商 雛 清 指 導(dǎo) 教 師 : 施 延 亮 副 教 授 完 成 日 期 : 2 0 1
2、7 年 5 月 上海師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文 2 Abstract Abstract In the Ming dynasty China has come to dawn of imperial age, Dictatorship against the background of an unprecedented strengthening imperial power increasingly anarchy. Tradition
3、al Chinese monarchy as the core of political system, based on agricultural economic structure and its derivative which composed of four people level set by the impact of the new elements. An unprecedented strengthening i
4、mperial power system with age change became weaker and weaker. Bud of capitalism economic developments strongly shock the Confucian tradition, promoting the emerging class status changes. Changes of social existence have
5、 given rise to against tyranny, a departure from the traditional enlightenment thought germination. This slow and silent changes is that the Ming dynasty in the traditional system of the characteristics of the new elemen
6、ts and its important value as a transitional phase. This article compares with QIUJUN and HUANGZONGXI legal thought as the breakthrough point, sorting out the similarities and differences between the two and try to analy
7、ze the causes, and the theoretical height using the modern jurisprudence paradigm of QIU and comparing with HUANG legal thought. The paper is divided into six parts as follow. The first part briefly introduces their life
8、 and major works. The second part will be from the time background of two thoughts, time background mainly includes political, economic, social and cultural aspects, and from two people because of the close similarities
9、and social culture changes brought by the concrete analysis, two ideological differences. The third part tells two legal thoughts based on the most important theoretical basis and important principles. QIU legal thought
10、is based on the traditional Confucian thought , level of etiquette was under the influence of the Confucian thought, theory of Comprehensive use of moral Etiquette administration punishment the and concept of Confucianis
11、m. Huang built his theory on three basic principles: the idea of evil human nature setting, the differences between private and public, attaches great importance to the industrial industry and commerce. The fourth part w
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 丘濬、黃宗羲法思想比較研究.pdf
- 丘濬貨幣思想新論.pdf
- 丘濬的司法思想研究.pdf
- 丘濬《大學(xué)衍義補(bǔ)》法律思想研究.pdf
- 丘濬的“相業(yè)”研究
- 黃宗羲治法思想研究.pdf
- 明代丘濬的學(xué)術(shù)思想和成才原因研究.pdf
- 丘濬研究述評(píng)_15716.pdf
- 黃宗羲治法思想探究.pdf
- 丘濬的“相業(yè)”研究_19617.pdf
- 黃宗羲民本思想研究
- 邊沁與黃宗羲經(jīng)濟(jì)倫理思想比較研究.pdf
- 黃宗羲詩學(xué)思想研究
- 黃宗羲易學(xué)思想研究
- 黃宗羲君權(quán)思想研究.pdf
- 石田梅巖與黃宗羲經(jīng)濟(jì)思想比較.pdf
- 黃宗羲民本思想研究.pdf
- 黃宗羲易學(xué)思想研究.pdf
- 黃宗羲民本管理思想研究
- 黃宗羲法律思想研究.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論