論呼喚功能語篇翻譯中的語義喪失.pdf

1、哈爾濱理工大學碩士學位論文論呼喚功能語篇翻譯中的語義喪失姓名：李麗申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：英語語言文學指導教師：張文英20090301哈爾濱理工大學文學碩士學位論文——■—■—■—●■■■—■■——■●■●●盲●●皇■富■葺皇●獸暑暑=皇=皇魯昌魯詈皇皇暑昌皇暑詈昌暑暑詈昌詈詈暑暑—墨I皇——詈_■●———■——●—詈昌富置曩茸置暑魯詈皇詈皇昌魯暑昌詈詈曹暑暑OntheLossofMeaninginVocativeTextTransla

2、tionAbstractMeaningiSthekernelissueoftranslationandthenatureoftranslationisthecorrespondingtransferenceofmeaningfromonelanguagetoanotherthatistosaytranslationisatransferofmeaningbetweentwolanguagesThestudyoftranslationis

3、closelylinkedtothestudyoflanguageandmeaningInordertofindoutthecausesoflossofmeaningandavoidthelossofmeaningaSmuchaSpossibleinvocativetexttranslationthisthesismakesacomprehensiveanalysisofthephenomenaoflossofmeaningbyappl

4、yingsemiotictheoriesofmeaningandPeterNewmark’StypologyinresearchTheresearchscopeofthethesisislimitedtothevocativetexttranslationduetoPeterNewmark’Stypology(texttype)whichhaSdividedtextintothreetypes，namelyexpressivefunct

5、ion，informativefunctionandvo已tivefunctiononbaSisoflanguagefunctionsexplicatedbyGermanpsychologistKarlBuhlerThoughtherearefewstudiesandresearcheswhichintroducesemiotictheoriesofmeaningint0translation(mainlyliteraturetrans

6、lation)，almostnoresearchesorstudieshaSprobedsemiotictheoriesofmeaningintovocativetexttranslationdetailedlyThus，takingMorris’SMorris’trichotomyofmeaningasthetheoreticalbaSis，theauthorprobesintothelossesofreferentialmeanin

7、g，linguisticmeaningandpragmaticmeaninginthetranslationofvocativetext(suchaSadverting，touristpublicitypropagandaandpublicsigns)viausingcomparativeanalyticalmethodTheauthorfindsoutseveralCauseswhichleadtothelossofmeaningon

8、eisculturalvacancywhichresultsinlimitationoftranslatabilityandtheotherislexicalgapwhichresultsinuntranslatabilitysometimesCulturehasdistinctivenationalcharacters，andtheculturesofdifferentnationsnotonlysharetheconlInonnes

9、s，butalsohavetheirownindividualityandculturalvacancyisdeterminedbytheparticularitiesoftwocultures；lexicalgapisaspecialphenomenonoflanguagedifference，whichispresentedonlexicallevel，that’Stosaysomewordsinonelanguagecannotf