從皮爾士符號學的角度探討翻譯中的不對等現(xiàn)象.pdf

1、北京交通大學碩士學位論文從皮爾士符號學的角度探討翻譯中的不對等現(xiàn)象姓名：畢媛媛申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：外國語言學及應用語言學指導教師：李樹春20071201北京交通大學頊士論文InthisthesisPeirceansemioticsischosentoserveasthetheoreticalparadigmto咖dythephenomenonoftranslationnonequivalencewiththeexpectationt

2、hattheproblemoftranslationequivalencecanbebetterdiscussed脅allfwpc稿pc咖AmongseveralschoolsofsemioticsPehceausemioticshasb∞鋤ethenlainstrenmduetoitswideresearch∞opc，detailedsignclassificationrigorouslogicsystemandgreatpracti

3、calvalueAs鋤interdisciptinarysubjectsemioticshasexertedgreatinfluenceonmanydisciplines，buttheseminficaliymotivatedstudiesintranslation8rccomparativelydeficientbothinquantityandinqualityThestudyofnonequivalenceintranslatio

4、nfromPekceansemioticviewpointisthemaintaskofthisthesisInthelightofPeircesgeneralsigntheoryespeciallyhissi驢o叼ccl缸tc】rprat齟ttriadandhisconceptoneachinteractingcl舶啊ltinthis缸iadtheproblemofnonequivalenceinUanslafionisdiscuss

5、edandstudiedThewholethesisconsistsoffivepartsThefirstpartincludestheintroductionofsemioticsandtheliteraturereviewThesecondpartintroducesthemainconceptsandtheoriesofPekceansemioticsincludingthefoundationalcategoriesofPeir

6、cessemiotics，thesignobjectinterpretantsemiotictriadthesemiosisandthreegeneralprinciplesofPeirceansemioticsInthethirdparttherelationshipbch啪semioticsandtranslationPeirceansemioticsandtranslationtheproblemoftranslationequi

7、valenceandPeircesunderstandingoftranslationequivalencearepresentedThefon_nhpartismostimportantInthispartbasedonPeircessemiotictheoriestheproblemofnonequivalenceintranslationjsstudiedanddiscussedintermsofs咖objectrelations

8、igninterpretantrelationandsignsignrelationrespectivelyAttheendofthispan，theproposalisputforwardthattheequivalenttranslationshouldbeattemptedintheutmostdegreenomatterhowharditisFinallyageneralconclusionisdrawnfiomthedba代d

9、iscussionPeircessigntheoryCallshedn伽tightontranslationstudiesandancwtrendsemiotranslationisgrowingButtherestillexistmanyproblemswhichrequiresmoreworkandfurtherstudiesKEYWORDS：PeirceanSemiotics；Translation；Nonequivalence；