版權(quán)說(shuō)明：本文檔由用戶提供并上傳，收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方，若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán)，請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論IBA證據(jù)規(guī)則下的文件證據(jù)制度姓名：劉穎申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：法律國(guó)際法指導(dǎo)教師：邊永民20090401AbstractIBArulesofevidencealsoknownasIBARulesonthetakingofEvidenceinInternationalCommercialArbitrationiSdevelopedbasedonIBA’scoordinationofthedifference
2、sofrulesofevidencebetweenthetwo1awsysternsIttriestoCOOrdinatewithandgetsclosetotherealityofarbitrationoperationasmuchaspossible，aimingatreducingthedifferencesofrulesofevidenceinarbitrationpracticesThebasicprincipleis：Eac
3、hPartyshallbeentitledtoknowreasonablyinadvanceofanyEvidentiaryHearing，theevidenceonwhichtheotherPartiesrelyInthisPaper’themethodofcomparativeanalysisWasusedtofoCUSonthestudyofdocumentaryevidenceinIBArulesofevidenceDocume
4、ntaryevidence，asatitleofcommonlaw，iscorrespondingtoevidenceinwritinginthecivillawTheIntroductionofthisarticlehasdescribedthebackgroundandcontentsofIBARulesofEvidenceaswellasthenecessityandsignificanceofthissubjectInChapt
5、er2，wediscussedtheconeeptofdocumentaryevidence，andcomparativelyanalysedthesimilaritiesanddifferencesofconnotationsofdocumentaryevidencebetweencolnnlonlaw，civillaw，IBArulesofevidenceandChineserulesofevidenceMeanwhile，weha
6、vealsodiscussedtheclassificationofelectronicdocumentaryevidence，andthedifferentiationbetweentheoriginalcopiesandduplicatecopies，andbetweenpublicdocumentandprivatedocument。InChapter3，wediscussedtheapplicablerulesofevidenc
7、eusedfordocumentaryevidence，comparativelyanalysedthesimilaritiesanddifferencesoftherulesofdocumentaryevidencebetweenthetwolawsystemsfromtheperspectivesofcredibilityrulesandprobativeforceandthenanalysedthemeaningofsection
8、311ofIBARulesofEvidence，comparedwiththeChineserulesofori矛nalevidencepriorityandfinallymaderecommendationsfortheconstructionofChineserulesofevidenceInChapter4，wefocusedonthedisclosureThissystemhasbeenalreadyadoptedbyIBAru
9、lesofevidenceaspartofitsbasicspirit；howeveritisnotentirelyidenticaltothedisclosureofcommonlawanditismoreflexibleAsthedisclosurehasdrawbacksoftime—consumingandexpensive，wediscussedtherestrictionsonthescopeofdisclosure，and
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明，都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等，如果需要附件，請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙，網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽，若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間，僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理，對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯，并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容，請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系，我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 論傳聞證據(jù)規(guī)則
- 論刑事證據(jù)規(guī)則.pdf
- 國(guó)際商事仲裁中證據(jù)效力認(rèn)定的問(wèn)題——《IBA證據(jù)規(guī)則》對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒.pdf
- 傳聞證據(jù)規(guī)則
- 論自白補(bǔ)強(qiáng)證據(jù)規(guī)則.pdf
- 仲裁證據(jù)規(guī)則與民事訴訟證據(jù)規(guī)則比較研究
- 刑事訴訟證據(jù)規(guī)則論綱.pdf
- 論美國(guó)品格證據(jù)規(guī)則及其借鑒.pdf
- 數(shù)字證據(jù)的法律定位及證據(jù)規(guī)則初探.pdf
- 論高校學(xué)生處分的證據(jù)規(guī)則.pdf
- 論WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中的證據(jù)規(guī)則.pdf
- 完善我國(guó)證據(jù)制度的構(gòu)想——論中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)證據(jù)心理之重構(gòu)與西方證據(jù)規(guī)則的移植.pdf
- 民事品格證據(jù)規(guī)則研究.pdf
- “羅馬規(guī)約”證據(jù)規(guī)則研究.pdf
- 商事仲裁證據(jù)規(guī)則研究.pdf
- 刑事瑕疵證據(jù)規(guī)則研究.pdf
- 論行政訴訟中的證據(jù)規(guī)則.pdf
- 論英美法上口頭證據(jù)規(guī)則的例外.pdf
- 仲裁證據(jù)規(guī)則的完善路徑
- 環(huán)境刑事證據(jù)規(guī)則研究.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論