[雙語翻譯]糧食安全外文翻譯—觀點食品安全與營養(yǎng)的未來——追求雙贏，權(quán)衡利弊

1、字數(shù)：英文 字數(shù)：英文 2741 2741 單詞， 單詞，15243 15243 字符；中文 字符；中文 5057 5057 漢字 漢字出處： 出處：Mylona Mylona K, K, Maragkoudakis Maragkoudakis P, P, Miko Miko L, L, et et al. al. Future Future of of food food safety safety and a

2、nd nutrition-Seeking nutrition-Seeking win-wins, win-wins, coping coping with with trade-offs[J]. trade-offs[J]. Food Food Policy, Policy, 2018, 2018, 74: 74: 143-146. 143-146.外文文獻 外文文獻 Viewpoint: Future of food safety a

3、nd nutrition - Seeking win-wins, coping with trade-offsAbstract The possible implications of global trends such as climate change and resource scarcity on food security are high on the political agendas. While the food

4、sufficiency aspect of food security takes centre-stage, the future of food safety and nutritional quality of diets often seems to be taken for granted. This paper builds on the results of a foresight study on EU food saf

5、ety and nutrition towards 2050 to discuss potential future points of tension for food policy. Increasing food production while using fewer resources and reducing food waste while ensuring food safety are just two example

6、s. Innovation at different levels in the food system will be needed to address future challenges. Fast technology uptake and the launch of new food-related products can put pressure on the ability to deliver timely risk

7、assessments, the scope of which might also need to cover other legitimate factors. Future food policies need to be more sensitive to impacts on food safety and nutrition and health aspects. A holistic food systems approa

8、ch must be taken to identify and discuss in advance possible tensions and trade-offs and to address them upfront in a systematic and transparent manner.Keywords: Food safety; Nutrition; Foresight; Challenges; Preparednes

9、s; Trade-offsenvironmental and economic determinants, do not receive the attention they deserve in food security studies, as the sufficiency aspect appears to be more pressing. Moreover, the abundant food offer and almos

10、t unrestricted access to a large variety of nutritious quality foods in most of the developed countries, result in the skewed view that it is up to the individual to make the right decisions and succeed in life and healt

11、h. Making nutritious food available does not automatically lead to population-wide healthy diets (Butland et al., 2007). Despite a series of initiatives and action plans towards the promotion of healthier diets and preve

12、ntion of chronic diseases (High Level Group on Nutrition and Physical activity, 2014, WHO, 2014), achieving health targets such as those defined in the WHO Noncommunicable Diseases Global Monitoring Framework 2025 (World

13、 Health Organization, 2015a) proves to be difficult already today.To shed light on possible future challenges, we have analysed whether the EU’s regulatory and policy framework in the areas of food safety and nutrition c

14、an ensure “safe food” and “good nutrition” as we look ahead to 2050 (Mylona et al., 2016). Drivers of change (global trade, agro-food chain structure, technology uptake, social cohesion, food values, climate change, depl

15、etion of natural resources and world population growth) were combined to create four alternative, plausible and challenging future scenarios (Mylona et al., 2016). While the study was intended to inform EU policies and t

16、o complement the recent Fitness Check of the General Food Law (Regulation (EC) No 178/2002), its conclusions are of relevance for almost every jurisdiction.We identified several points of tension where policies or interv

17、entions that aim to improve food safety, the diets of populations or food sufficiency conflict with each other. We conclude that a holistic food systems approach must be taken to identify and discuss in advance such tens

18、ions, in order to find a compromise between equally important aspects of the food system and accept trade-offs in a systematic and transparent manner. And beyond trade-offs, such an approach could also identify synergies