軟學(xué)科和硬學(xué)科學(xué)術(shù)論文摘要中介入資源的對比分析——以經(jīng)濟學(xué)和工程學(xué)為例_16670.pdf

1、暨南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文暨南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文題名（中英對照）：AContrastiveAnalysisofEngagementResourcesbetweenSoftDisciplinesHardDisciplinesRAAsWithaparticularreferencetoEconomicsEngineeringRAAs軟學(xué)科和硬學(xué)科學(xué)術(shù)論文摘要中介入資源的對比分析以經(jīng)濟學(xué)和工程學(xué)為例作者姓名：劉文姣指導(dǎo)教師姓名及學(xué)位、職稱：王全智博士

2、副教授學(xué)科、專業(yè)名稱：外國語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)學(xué)位類型：學(xué)術(shù)學(xué)位論文提交日期：2015年月日論文答辯日期：2015年月日答辯委員會主席：論文評閱人：學(xué)位授予單位和日期：暨南大學(xué)暨南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文IAbstractAbstractsanacademicgenreserveasatimesaverindexresearchenginebecauseitisthethresholdtoafullarticleaffdingtoreaderst

3、hemaincontentinfmation.Readers’furtherreadingdependstoagreatextentonasuccessfulconstructionofanabstract.Suchadramaticallyimptantroledoesanabstractplayinanarticlethatresearcharticlewritershavetoputarduousefftsinexaminingi

4、tsmicrolinguisticdevices.Althoughitiswidelyheldthatthespecificdisciplinarityofaparticulardisciplineinfluencesgreatlyitscommunitymembers’choicesoflinguisticdeviceswhentheyconstructresearcharticleabstracts(RAAs)ftheaccepta

5、ncefromtheirowncommunitythestudiesontheengagementresourcesofRAAsofdifferentdisciplinesarestillfewfarbetween.OnthebasisofMartin’sappraisaltheythepresentthesisistorevealthesimilaritiesdissimilaritiesofengagementresourcesbe

6、tweenharddisciplines(HDs)softdisciplines(SDs)inresearcharticleabstractssettingpracticesfnovicewriterswhentheywriteanabstractappropriatetoaparticulardisciplinarycommunity.Basedontheselfestablishedcpusof40RAAs20RAAsdrawnfr

7、omEconomics(Ec)Engineering(En)respectivelyaprofoundcontrastiveanalysisoftheuseofengagementresourceshasbeenconductedbyexplinghowwritersofEcEnexploittheseresourcestoachievetheirsamecommunicativepurposeineachmoveofthisgenre

8、.StartingwiththegenreanalysisofabstractsinthiscpuswithapurposetorevealwhichrheticalstructuretheyfollowtheIMRDmodeltheCARSmodelitturnsoutthatthediscrepancyinuseofengagementresourcesareattributedtodisciplinaryvariationdiff

9、erentcommunicativepurposesthatwritersintendtoachieveineachmove.Themainfindingsofthepresentthesishaveboththeeticalpedagogicalimplications.TheeticallythecombinationoftwotheiesSwales’genreanalysisatmacrolevelMartin’sengagem