大學(xué)生英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作在線自動(dòng)評(píng)價(jià)的反饋研究——以句酷網(wǎng)為例_1042.pdf

1、I分類號(hào)：密級(jí)：無(wú)學(xué)校代碼：10414學(xué)號(hào)：2012010227碩士研究生學(xué)位論文碩士研究生學(xué)位論文AStudyonFeedbackinCollegeEnglishWritingBasedonAutomatedWritingEvaluationSystem————ACaseStudyofJuku大學(xué)生英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作在線自動(dòng)評(píng)價(jià)的反饋研究大學(xué)生英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作在線自動(dòng)評(píng)價(jià)的反饋研究————以句酷網(wǎng)為例以句酷網(wǎng)為例院所：教育學(xué)院導(dǎo)師姓名：劉春燕學(xué)科專業(yè)：

2、課程與教學(xué)論研究方向：英語(yǔ)教育學(xué)二○一五年六月IIIAbstractAutomatedwritingevaluation(AWE)programbasedoneducationaltechnologyautomaticallyprovidesassessmentfeedbacktostudents‘compositions.Suchwayofassessingcompositionsessayshasbecomethedirection

3、trendoffuturefeedbackresearch.Jukuasatooltoevaluationstudents‘writingabilitiesinthisstudyisoneofsuchsystems.PreviousstudiesonAWEhasgenerallycenteredonexaminingitsreliabilityvaliditycomparisonwithhumanratersparticipants‘f

4、eedbacksoon.ThepurposeofthisstudyistotakesJukuasanexampletodiscusstheeffectsofautomatedessayfeedbackonwritingdevelopmentofChinesecollegeEFLleaners.Thesubjectsinthisstudywere160EFLsophomes5Englishwritingteachersfromaunive

5、rsityinJiangxi.Bothquantitativequalitativeresearchmethodswereused:aquestionnaireasemistructuredinterviewstudents‘writingsamplesanalysis.Theresearchquestionsare:(1)whatisstudents‘a(chǎn)ttitudetowardstheusageofAWEJuku‘sfeedback

6、(2)Whatisteachers‘a(chǎn)ttitudetowardstheusageoftheAWE(3)WhateffectsdoesJuku‘sfeedbackhaveonlearners‘revisionofessaysonlearners‘writingaccuracydevelopmentTheresearchresultsrevealthatonthewholestudentsheldpositiveattitudestowa

7、rdtheintegrateduseofJuku.ItisfoundthatJuku‘sfeedbackismosthelpfulincheckinggrammarprovidingsuggestionsfwdusagerevisingmechanicsmistakes.Howeverthestudentsdonotrecognizethehelpfulnessofautomatedfeedbackincontentganization

8、.What‘smemostofthestudentsconsideredthatgradesgivenbytheprogramcannotreflecttheiractualEnglishwritingabilitytherevisionfeedbackgivenbyJukusometimesiswrong.Meoveramajityofstudentsinthisstudythoughttheautomatedfeedbackwasn

9、otspecificinfmativeenoughtoguidethemhowtorevisetheirwritings.Theteachers‘viewsonthepotentialofAWEcrectivefeedbackinhelpingstudentswithgrammarmechanicswerelargelypositivealthoughtheywerenotcompletelysatisfiedwiththequalit

10、yofthefeedback.Teachers‘jobontheganizationcontentissimplyirreplaceable.AsfthewritingaccuracyJukucancrectoverhalfofstudents‘errs(53.6%).Besideswealsofoundthatapproximately11.5%oftheJukufeedbackwaswrong.Theseinadequatefeed