倫理批評視角下的《二手煙》_23076.pdf

1、廈門大學(xué)學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人呈交的學(xué)位論文是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下，獨(dú)立完成的研究成果。本人在論文寫作中參考其他個人或集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表的研究成果，均在文中以適當(dāng)方式明確標(biāo)明，并符合法律規(guī)范和《廈門大學(xué)研究生學(xué)術(shù)活動規(guī)范(試行)》。另外，該學(xué)位論文為()課題(組)的研究成果，獲得()課題(組)經(jīng)費(fèi)或?qū)嶒?yàn)室的資助，在()實(shí)驗(yàn)室完成。(請在以上括號內(nèi)填寫課題或課題組負(fù)責(zé)人或?qū)嶒?yàn)室名稱，未有此項(xiàng)聲明內(nèi)容的，可以不作特●別聲明。)聲明人(簽名)：物麗蝎側(cè)

2、戽占月爭日AbstractByreferringtoJewishethicsreflectedbothinJudaismandJewishtraditionandthesituationofHolocaustwritingstartingfromthenarrativestrategiesofthenovel，thisMAthesisaimstouncovcTtheethicalappealsbonlexplicitlyadvocate

3、dbyThaneRosenbaumandimplicitlyexpressedinhisSecondHandSmokeThenarrativeisfulloffragmentationswitlltransferringtimeandspaceThepastandthepresentappearsimultaneouslyforcomparisonAccompaniedbyallomniscientthirdpersonnarrator

4、theauthorgivesmaincharacterspointsofviewanddepictsthemwimmultifacetedpersonalitiesThenarrativenotonlyshowsthesituationofJewsinthepostHolocausterabutalsotheauthor’SethicalappealsNon—Jewsshouldrespondtothehistoricalpastand

5、JewsshouldrealizepersonalresponsibilityasJewsByportrayingcharacterswithdifferentattitudestowardstheHolocaustandtheirresponsibilitymakingtheoneswithJewishethicshaveabetterknowledgeoflife，theauthoradvocatestherecoveryofJew

6、ishethicsinthepostHolocausteraThusmythesisbeginswiththeauthor’SmainnarrativestrategiesandkeepinginmindethicalappealsbehinditgoesonwithreferencetoJewishethics。albeitwithsubjectivecommentsbasedonculturalandtextualanalysisa

7、ndhopesforaclearerviewoftheauthor’Sethicalappealsandthenovel’SethicaldimensionThethesisconsistsoffourpartsIntheintroductionpartbriefinformationofHolocaustwritingandabriefoverviewofThaneRosenbaumandhisSecondHandSmokearegi

8、venThefirstchapterfocusesmainlyontheauthor’sethicalappealsinthenovelMultiplepointsofviewonethicsandmultifacetedcharacterizationononehandgivereadersachancetomakeobjectivejudgmentsofcharactersinvolved，onetheotherhandactiva