版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文試論存疑不訴案件的國(guó)家賠償姓名:吳凱申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):法律刑事訴訟法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:陳乃新20061001IIABSTRACTAtpresentensuringhumanrightssettingupnationalcompensationsystemisnotonlytheinevitablerequirementofthemodernsocietygovernedbylawbutalsothedevelopin
2、gmainstreaminourtimes.Itisoneofthejustimptantstardsofjudgingthenationaladministrationofjusticewhetherhumanrightsareensuredespeciallythelawfulrightofthesuspectdefendantissafeguardedtrulynotincriminalsuit.Ourcountryestabli
3、shtonationalcompensationresponsibilitytopeoplethatareinfringedthroughissuing“StateCompensationLaw“havestrengthenedthepowerofsafeguardingrights.Butlikewiseundeniablethislawwithgoodiginalintentiontheprovisiononcriminalcomp
4、ensationistoosimpleabstractleadtothefacttwoSupremeCourtholdsitsownopinionintheconcreteadministrationofjusticeespeciallyviewsaboutnonprosecutionwithdoubtsaredifferentlargelyhavehinderedthefullplayofthefunctionofnationalco
5、mpensationsystemseriouslyhasinitiatedpeoplestrustcrisistothislawdirectlycausemanypeopletobedeeplyawareofhelplessnesswhenfacingthecountrycompensate.AsapersonnelofengagingincriminalprocuratialcompensationIfeeldeeplythediff
6、icultyofplacingcasesofnonprosecutionwithdoubtsonfilecasesofobtainingcompensationislittlecompensationrangeisnarrow.Fromthementioningofnationalcompensationquestionaboutnonprosecutionwithdoubtsthejudicialrealityaboutittheev
7、aluationanalysisofdifferentviewsthecompletionofitfourrespectsItrytoanalyzethecurrentcriminalcompensationsystemaboutnonprosecutionwithdoubtsofourcountryastothedrawbackIproposesupplementarylegislatingofcompensationofnonpro
8、secutionwithdoubtssetupindependentganizationofcheckingcompensationstrengthenapplicationofnondetainmeasuresstipulateenfcedadministrationsystemofcompensationdecisionindertobeinghelpfultothepractice.Completingnationalcompen
9、sationsystemisscaleofthedemocracygovernedbylaw“reliefvalve“ofthesocialstability.Thelawmustbesteadybutnotunalterable.Theadministrationofjusticemustbejustbutthejustadministrationofjusticewillbesetuponthebaseofhavinglawstoa
10、bideby.Whenthelawcantbesatisfiedpeople’sbasicjusticedemthenitscompletionmodificationjustdemsurgentlytobebroughtintoschedule.Keywds:NonprosecutionwithdoubtsCriminalcompensationTheprincipleofbelongingofcompensationresponsi
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 從刑事賠償制度的法理性看刑事存疑案件的國(guó)家賠償.pdf
- 試論我國(guó)國(guó)家賠償范圍.pdf
- 試論國(guó)家賠償法的公法性與國(guó)家賠償?shù)乃椒ㄐ?pdf
- 試論我國(guó)國(guó)家賠償責(zé)任范圍.pdf
- 檢察機(jī)關(guān)作出逮捕決定后存疑不起訴的國(guó)家賠償之博弈
- 國(guó)家賠償責(zé)任的實(shí)現(xiàn).pdf
- 國(guó)家賠償與民事賠償?shù)谋容^研究.pdf
- 完善國(guó)家賠償程序的構(gòu)想.pdf
- 國(guó)家賠償混合責(zé)任研究.pdf
- 國(guó)家賠償范圍拓展論.pdf
- 國(guó)家賠償之損害賠償范圍研究.pdf
- 對(duì)國(guó)家賠償?shù)姆裳芯俊浴摆w作海獲國(guó)家賠償案”為例.pdf
- 論國(guó)家賠償中的精神損害賠償
- 論國(guó)家賠償中的追償權(quán).pdf
- 國(guó)家賠償金制度研究.pdf
- 我國(guó)國(guó)家賠償制度研究.pdf
- 試論檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)《國(guó)家賠償法》的監(jiān)督職責(zé)
- 論國(guó)家賠償責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則.pdf
- 論我國(guó)國(guó)家賠償?shù)臍w責(zé)原則.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論