論外國仲裁裁決在我國的承認和執(zhí)行.pdf

1、中國海洋大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論外國仲裁裁決在我國的承認和執(zhí)行姓名：崔琳申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：國際法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：李雁200906100ntheAdmittanceandEnforcementtoAForeignArbitrationAwardintheChineseCourtAbs七ractChinaioinedtothe“Reco毋1itionandEnforcementOfForeigllArbiIralAwardsConvention

2、”(theNew、兩rkConvention)in1987Sincethenithasbeen22yearsDuringthisperioditsarbitrationhasacenaindevelopmentandissuedthe“ArbitratiOnLaw”in1995The“ArbitrationLaw”providesaconcreteimplementationofthelegalbasisfor“TheNewYorkCo

3、nvention”，butthelawstillhasalotofuncenaintVandrelativelegalgapsTheresult0fthatistherearemoreproblemsOnthereco口1itionaIldenfbrcementoff0rei舀larbitralawardsinthejudicialpracticeandtheseproblemshaveseriouslydamagedthereputa

4、tionofChina’sintemationalarbitrationInthisarticle，theauthorhopeitwillbeusefultoourcountry’siudicialpractice柚dle酉slationbyintroducingtheconceptandscopeoftheforeigllarbitrationawardsaIldprocedures0fOurcountrVontheadmittanc

5、eandenforcement0fforei印arbitralawards，仃omwhichtofindtheproblemsinourcountry，thenintroducestherclevantlegislationofsomeadvancedcountriesBydoingthatmakeourcountrycanhaVeaclearlawtofollowOntheadmjttanceandenforcement0fforei

6、星皿arbitrationa、Ⅳards，alldmakesureourcountryuseasupponjveattitudetowardstheenforcement0ffbreignafbitrationawardsThefirstdlapterOfthisaniCleintroducestheconceptandscopeofforei印arbitrationawards，inaccordancewiththecircumscr

7、iptionofTheNewYOrkConventiOn0nforei印arbitrationawardsdescribedindetailthedefinitiOnOfforei齲arbitrationawards，includingseveralsituationsAndcontainthemostcontroversyiIltheacademicworldthatnOndOmesticarbitrationawardwhether

8、ornotbelongst0forei霉皿arbitralawards，asweUaswhenChina’saccessiontothe”NewYork(乃nvention”madecontentoftheoommercialreservationandreciprocityresen，ationIhopefb加theintroduction0fallthatabovewecanhaveacenainunderstanding0fcon

9、CreteThesecondchapter，thisaniclefocusesonhowt0admit鋤denfo賦aforeigIlarbitrationawardinChina，includingacourtthathasiurisdictionover，rcquireddocuments，ourreviewsystemoftheCoun，thesubjectsofourcourtsrefusetoadmitandenfor(：e^

10、vhjchonlyintroducedfburthemostcontroversjalmatters)，卸dreponingsystemofourCounstefusetoadmitandenforce，觚dalsocitedanumberofforei印advancedcountriesle百slationandtheproVisions鋤dourcomparison，whichhopingtodrawinspirationf而mTh

11、ischapterfocusesonthecontentthatafewsubiectsof“theNewYorl【Convention”inAnicleV，includingtodeteminetheinvalidity0fthearbitrationa盯eement，therec0印ition柚denforcement0fthearbitrationawardwhicharerevoked，disputearbitrabilitVa

12、ndpublicpolicy’sutilization，andlistedle百slationaIldcaseofsomecountriesforco盯esponding，lhopethatcanbeusefulfbrourcountryinjudicialpracticeChapterIIIofthisaniclearemainlypointoutthatthemainproblemsofourcountryontheadmittan