從西漢儒生的被殺看西漢儒學(xué)與王權(quán)的矛盾_10784.pdf

1、摘要中文摘要王朝秦朝相遇，就遭遇了“焚書坑儒“命運(yùn)，這，但是秦朝政府仍然任用儒生，吸納儒家學(xué)說，，漢武帝的“獨(dú)尊儒術(shù)”，使儒學(xué)的地位得到提的改變：義利觀念由從重于義發(fā)展為重于利；經(jīng)書和皇帝的好惡則成為了西漢儒生入仕的主要途徑。雖然儒生盡力附庸王權(quán)，但是儒生的命運(yùn)卻也沉浮不定，動(dòng)輒被殺。他們的被殺方式有族、腰斬、棄市、被迫自殺等。其被殺的具體原因各異，筆者選取其中有代表性的三位：韓延壽、蕭望之和京房，介紹他們的生平并簡要分析他們被殺的原因

2、。通過分析這三位被殺儒生的原因，從而引出了西漢儒學(xué)與王權(quán)之間的矛盾：一是因?yàn)槲鳚h儒生堅(jiān)持先秦儒家的“道“而觸犯了王權(quán)，導(dǎo)致其被殺。西漢儒生堅(jiān)持“道”的方式有兩種：犯言直諫和災(zāi)異評論時(shí)政。二是西漢儒學(xué)的神學(xué)化的弊端與君權(quán)之間的矛盾。西漢儒學(xué)神化的方式是五行災(zāi)異和五行運(yùn)數(shù)，這兩種學(xué)說自身本來就有問題，在借助神權(quán)來限制王權(quán)時(shí)，不可避免地與西漢專制王權(quán)發(fā)生矛盾，而矛盾斗爭的結(jié)果是儒生的被殺。關(guān)鍵詞：儒生；儒學(xué)；被殺；矛盾摘要AbstractCo

3、nfucianismwhenitencounteredQinDynastywhichistheidealoftheunifiedcountryforthefirsttime，wentthroughthe”Fenshukengru”，whichiSaheavyblowtoConfucianscholars。Nevertheless，theGovernmentstillappointedConfucianscholarsacceptedCo

4、nfucianism，andConfucianismWasnotinterruptedintheQinDynastyIntheHanDynastythepolicyofEmperorWu，honoringConfucianismexclusivelymadeConfucianscholars’statustremendouschange：Conceptofjusticeandinterestsandmoraltransferredfro

5、mjusticeorientedtoprofitoriented；classicbooksofConfucianismandtheemperor’StastebecamethemainwayfortheW色stemHanDynastyConfucianscholarstojoininthepoliticalstratumAlthoughscholarstriedtOsubordinatetothekingship，thefateofsc

6、holarsWasalSOvolatileupsanddownsandeasilykiliednlewaysthattheywerekilledarethatexterminationofallentirefamilycuttingsbintwoatthewaistabandonmentofthebodyinpublicmarketafterexecution，beingforcedtocommitsuicideetcThespecif

7、icreasonsfortheirmurdervaries，theauthorselectsthreeasrepresentatives：HanYanshou，XiaoWang，andJingFang，andintroducestheirlivesandmakesbriefanalysisoftheirreasonsforbeingkilledThroughthereasonsoftheirbeingkilled，theauthortr

8、iestoanalyzethecontradictionbetweenConfucianscholarsandtheimperialpower：FirstsincetheWestemHanDynastyConfucianscholarsinsistedonthe“Tao”ofConfucianismandviolatedthemonarchyleadingtotheirbeingkilied，therearetwowaysthatWes

9、temHartDynastyscholarsadheredtothe”Tao”Therearetwoways：firstlymakingsuggestionswhenencounteredresistanceandcommentsofCatastrophistPolitics；secondlythecontradictionsbetweenthedrawbacksoftheapotheosisoftheW色stemHanDynastyC

10、onfucianismandthemonarchiealpowerThewaysoftheapotheosisofthe艙stemHartDynastyConfucianismaretheFiveElementsFiveElementsCatastrophistofluck，thesetwotheoriesdohaveaproblemthemselves，Intheuseofdivinepowertolimittheimpenalpow