2023年全國(guó)碩士研究生考試考研英語(yǔ)一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁(yè)
已閱讀1頁(yè),還剩30頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、此文檔是畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)外文翻譯成品( 含英文原文+中文翻譯) ,無(wú)需調(diào)整復(fù)雜的格式!下載之后直接可用,方便快捷!本文價(jià)格不貴,也就幾十塊錢(qián)!一輩子也就一次的事!外文標(biāo)題:Evaluating the effectiveness of brand-positioning strategies from a consumer perspective外文作者:Christoph Fuchs, Adamantios Diamantopoulo

2、s文獻(xiàn)出處: European Journal of Marketing Vol. 44 No. 11/12, 2018 (如覺(jué)得年份太老,可改為近 2 年,畢竟很多畢業(yè)生都這樣做)英文 5979 單詞,38597 字符(字符就是印刷符),中文 8981 漢字。 (如果字?jǐn)?shù)多了,可自行刪減,大多數(shù)學(xué)校都是要求選取外文的一部分內(nèi)容進(jìn)行翻譯的。 )Evaluating the effectiveness of brand-positioni

3、ng strategies from a consumer perspectiveAbstractPurpose – The purpose of the paper is to explore empirically the overall relative effectiveness of alternative positioning strategies from a consumer perspective.Design/me

4、thodology/approach – Two studies (within- and between-subjects design) are conducted aimed at evaluating the positioning success of four distinct positioning strategies of real brands in terms of consumers’ perceptions o

5、f brand favorability, differentiation, and credibility, while controlling for brand-specific, product category-specific, and socio-demographic influences.Findings – The results show that the type of positioning strategy

6、used affects the positioning success of a brand. More specifically, the study confirms normative arguments about the overall relative effectiveness of main positioning strategies by revealing that benefit-based positioni

7、ng and surrogate (user) positioning generally outperform feature-based positioning strategies along the three effectiveness dimensions. The findings also demonstrate that no single strategy outperforms all the others on

8、all dimensions.Research limitations/implications – The study is limited in terms of the number of Despite the importance of brand positioning, however, limited empirical attention has been paid to the question whether th

9、e use of certain positioning strategies (e.g. benefit-based positioning) results in more superiorly positioned brands than the application of other strategies (e.g. user-based positioning) (Keller and Lehmann, 2006; Pham

10、 and Muthukrishnan, 2002). The purpose of the current study is to close this gap and compare the effectiveness of prototypical positioning strategies of real brands from a consumer perspective and thus provide brand mana

11、gers and advertisingprofessionals with empirically-based insights for making sound positioning decisions.We conceptualize positioning effectiveness as a multidimensional construct capturing consumers’ evaluations of a br

12、and’s position in terms of credible and favorable differentiations in relation to competing brands, thus enabling an assessment of the extent to which the brand in question occupies a credible, distinct, and positively v

13、alued position in the minds of consumers. Our comparison of positioning strategies is therefore undertaken along three key dimensions (i.e. favorability, differentiation, and credibility) which jointly determine overall

14、positioning success; our analysis alsocontrols for extraneous influences such as corporate brand associations or advertising creativity that may potentially confound the effect of positioning strategy on the aforemention

15、ed dimensions.In the next section, we provide a brief conceptual background on the notion of brand positioning and follow this by a conceptualization and operationalization of brand positioning strategies and effectivene

16、ss. Next, we present the results of two separate empirical studies designed to offer complementary insights into the perceived effectiveness of different positioning strategies employed within a given product category (c

17、ompact cars). We conclude the paper with a discussion of the implications of the findings, its limitations, and suggestions for future research.Literature backgroundTo avoid confusions about the meaning of the positionin

18、g concept, it is important to distinguish between brand positioning and strategic (market) positioning (see DiMingo, 1988; Ellson, 2004). Strategic (market) positioning refers to the competitivemarket standing of a firm

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論