版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、汕頭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文中外報(bào)紙5.12汶川地震報(bào)道框架比較分析姓名:高文歡申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):新聞學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:陳婉瑩200905013 Abstract This study investigated into Chinese and foreign media’s coverage of the May 12 Wenchuan earthquake, which is the worst disaster in last thirt
2、y years in China. Disaster reporting has been an important area, and this study employed news framework theory and gatekeeper theory to compare the characteristics and causes of disaster reporting among Chinese press,
3、traditional party newspaper and market newspaper, as well as national and regional newspaper This study used content analysis method and examined how major foreign newspaper like the New York Tomes, the Los Angeles Times
4、, and Chinese newspaper, like, progressive Southern Metropolis Daily, as well as local Western China Metropolis Daily cover and framed the Sichuan earthquake during the first month. This paper found that both major Chi
5、nese newspaper and American newspaper have used news framework theory in covering the disaster, like political framework, economic consequence framework, disaster framework, human interest framework, leadership framework
6、 as well as responsibility framework, but have some differences. Chinese media tend to use more straight news style and foreign press uses more analysis style in covering the earthquake, and foreign press tend to use mo
7、re political framework, responsibility framework, but Chinese press use more economic consequence, human interest and leadership framework. Thus, the study researched into the difference of the four kinds of newspaper,
8、in particular compared the difference between party newspaper and market newspaper, which revealed the characteristics of news control, reporting model as well as professionalism in transitional China. Key words: News Fr
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 都市報(bào)中外災(zāi)難圖片報(bào)道比較研究——以《東方早報(bào)》汶川地震、東日本地震報(bào)道為例.pdf
- 唐山、汶川地震新聞報(bào)道比較研究.pdf
- 5.12汶川地震應(yīng)激事件對(duì)胰島功能的影響
- 比較唐山地震與汶川地震
- 汶川地震報(bào)道的倫理追問.pdf
- 報(bào)紙公益報(bào)道比較研究
- 歷史性大跨越——唐山地震、汶川地震新聞報(bào)道比較.pdf
- 5.12汶川地震災(zāi)后藏羌村落更新實(shí)踐研究
- 話語分析理論框架下的中日媒體地震報(bào)道比較研究
- 我國報(bào)紙媒體新農(nóng)村報(bào)道的框架分析.pdf
- 報(bào)紙公益報(bào)道比較研究.pdf
- 話語分析理論框架下的中日媒體地震報(bào)道比較研究.pdf
- 從汶川地震的央視報(bào)道看政治傳播
- 汶川地震建筑震害分析
- 災(zāi)難報(bào)道中的人文關(guān)懷——以汶川地震報(bào)道為例.pdf
- 汶川地震報(bào)道中電視新聞特寫研究.pdf
- 香港報(bào)紙“占中”事件報(bào)道框架研究
- 報(bào)紙和微博對(duì)山東疫苗事件的報(bào)道框架建構(gòu)比較.pdf
- “汶川地震”恢復(fù)期大眾媒體的新聞框架分析(20092013)
- 中國青年報(bào)汶川地震和雅安地震報(bào)道研究
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論