版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、THEVARIETIESOFGOODNESSbyGegHenrikvonWrightLONDONROUTLEDGE&KEGANPAULNEWYK:THEHUMANITIESPRESSiiiFirstpublished1963byRoutledge&KeganPaulLtdBroadwayHouse6874CarterLaneLondonE.C.4PrintedinGreatBritainbyRidClayCompanyLtdBungay
2、Suffolk?GegHenrikvonWright1963NopartofthisbookmaybereproducedinanyfmwithoutpermissionfromthepublisherexceptfthequotationofbriefpassagesincriticismivPREFACEIN19591960IgavetheGiffdLecturesintheUniversityofSt.rews.Thelectur
3、eswerecalledNmsValuesanInquiryintotheConceptualFoundationsofMalsLegislation.ThepresentwkissubstantiallythesameasthecontentofthesecondseriesoflecturesthenadvertisedunderthenotveryadequatetitleValues.Itismyplantopublishare
4、visedversionofthecontentofthefirstseriesoflecturescalledNmsasaseparatebook.Thetwowkswillbeindependentofoneanother.ItakethisopptunitytoexpressmythankstotheUniversityofSt.rewsfhonouringmewiththeinvitationtogivetheGiffdLect
5、urestothemembersofstaffstudentsatSt.rewswithwhomIwasabletodiscussthecontentofthelectureswhentheywereinprogress.GivingthelecturesaffdedmewithanurgeopptunitytodoconcentratedresearchfwhichIamdeeplygrateful.Inthecourseofrevi
6、singthecontentsofmylecturespreparingthemfpublicationIhavehadtheprivilegeofregulardiscussionsoveralongperiodwithProfessNmanMalcolm.Iamindebtedtohimfanumberofobservationsimprovementsaboveallfhisfcefulchallengetomanyofmyarg
7、umentsviews.Thereisverylittleexplicitreferencetocurrentdiscussionliteratureinthisbook.Ihopenoonewillinterpretthisasasignthattheauthwishestoignebelittlethewkwhichisbeingdonebyothers.Itistruehoweverthatthewksoftheclassicsh
8、aveprovidedamuchstrongerstimulustomythoughtsthanthewritingsofmycontemparies.InparticularhaveIlearntfromthree:AristotleKantMoe.IhavebeensuccessivelyunderthespelloftheKantianideaofdutytheMoeanideaofintrinsicvalue.Infightin
9、gmywayagainstKantIwasledtorejectthepositionsometimescalleddeontologistinresistingMoeIbecameconvincedoftheuntenabilityofvalueobjectivismgoodnotavarietyofanalogicalmeanings.IsgoodnessafamilyconceptThemeaningpatternofgoodas
10、aproblemfphilosophicalsemantics8.Affinitiesbetweenthefmsofgoodness.Socalledmalgoodnessnotanindependentfmofthegood171.Preliminaryexplanationofinstrumentaltechnicalgoodness.Theinstrumentallytechnicallygoodthingisoftenbutno
11、tnecessarilygoodofitskind19vii2.Instrumentalgoodnessisprimarilygoodnessfapurpose.Instrumentalgoodnessofitskindpresupposesanessentialconnexionbetweenkindpurpose.Functionalmphologicalacteristicsofkinds.Thequestionofunityof
12、thekind203.Intherealmofinstrumentalgoodnesstheoppositeofgoodispo.Differencebetweenpobad.Thereisnoinstrumentalbadness224.Goodpoconnotecontradictiesratherthancontraries.Ponessaprivation235.Judgmentsofinstrumentalgoodnessbe
13、tternessareobjectivelytruefalse.Thesubjectivesettingofanysuchjudgment.Thenotionofagoodmakingproperty.Vaguenessinstrumentalgoodness246.Sentencesexpressingjudgmentsofinstrumentalgoodnesshaveadeivecontentsense.Whytheyshould
14、notbecalleddeivesentences.Distinctionbetweenthesenseofasentenceitsuse307.Instrumentalgoodnesscommending.Whydoesgoodnessappeal308.Instrumentalgoodnesspreferentialchoice.Distinctionbetweentherealtheapparentgood.Amannecessa
15、rilypreferswithaviewtoagivenpurposethethingwhichhejudgesbetterfthatpurpose319.Technicalgoodnessisprimarilygoodnessatsomething.Technicalgoodnessofitskindpresupposesanessentialconnexionbetweenkindactivity.Technicalgoodness
16、isacquirednotinnate3210.Intherealmoftechnicalgoodnesstheoppositeofgoodiscalledpobad.Theoppositionisbetweencontradictiesratherthancontraries.Technicalbadnessisaprivativenotion3411.Testsoftechnicalgoodness.Competitionachie
17、vementtests.Testsbysymptomsbycriteria.Thetechnicalgoodnessofprofessionalsissecondarytoinstrumentalgoodness.Noteonthecreativearts.Goodnessgreatness3512.Technicalgoodnesscommendingpraising.Technicalgoodnesskeennessonactivi
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 醫(yī)學(xué)倫理學(xué)與倫理學(xué)的屬性
- 生命倫理學(xué)視域下的性倫理建構(gòu)——??滦詫W(xué)的生命倫理學(xué)解讀.pdf
- 倫理學(xué)教案非倫理學(xué)專業(yè)
- 霍桑美真善圣的倫理訴求紅字的文學(xué)倫理學(xué)解讀
- 醫(yī)學(xué)倫理學(xué)
- 教師倫理學(xué)
- 生命倫理學(xué)
- 《護(hù)理倫理學(xué)》
- 通俗倫理學(xué)
- 社會倫理學(xué)
- 生命倫理學(xué)
- 《倫理學(xué)與現(xiàn)實生活——應(yīng)用倫理學(xué)引論》
- 環(huán)境倫理學(xué)
- 《護(hù)理倫理學(xué)》
- 醫(yī)學(xué)倫理學(xué)
- 應(yīng)用倫理學(xué)研究性課題
- 霍桑美真善圣的倫理訴求-《紅字》的文學(xué)倫理學(xué)解讀_26658.pdf
- 倫理學(xué)的理論類型
- 倫理概念及倫理學(xué)淺析
- 倫理學(xué)概論答案
評論
0/150
提交評論