心理學(xué)方面的外文翻譯--大學(xué)生心理健康水平狀況縱向研究

1、<p><b>　　中文3170字</b></p><p><b>　　畢業(yè)論文（設(shè)計(jì)）</b></p><p>　　外 文 文 獻(xiàn) 翻 譯</p><p>　　譯文題目：The Science Education Article Cultures</p><p>　　學(xué)生姓名：

2、 </p><p>　　專 業(yè)： </p><p>　　指導(dǎo)教師： </p><p>　　2015年1月10日</p><p>　　The Science Education Article Cultures</p&g

3、t;<p>　　Longitudinal Study on Mental Health of University Students: Taking a Finance and Economics University for an Example // Li Zhejun</p><p>　　Abstract Objective: To study the overall situation a

4、nd trend of freshmen's mental health of finance and economics university in recent years. Methods: The University Personality Inventory (UPI) was used to test the 21 492 freshmen during 2009~2012 in Nan-jing Univers

5、ity of Financeand Economics. Results: The mental health of students had a favorable development, the proportion of the students with serious mental health problems was among 6.95%~8.38%, the proportion of t

6、he students </p><p>　　Key words collegestudents;mentalhealth;UniversityPersonalityInventory （ UPI）;longitudinal study</p><p>　　To fully understand the mental health of college students, bu

7、ild students' mental file Case, so that psychological problems early detection, early intervention and early treatment, my school from 2009 Since the beginning of newborn psychological online survey to obtain a more

8、comprehensive and accurate The data. To understand the mental health of college freshmen in recent years, the overall Conditions and trends, this study will feed data 2009-2012 Statistical analysis</p><p>　　

9、1 Research Subjects and Methods</p><p>　　Research Subjects</p><p>　　Nanjing University of Finance 2009 -2012 years to participate in freshman psychology class 21,492 copies of census questionnai

10、res for the study. 2009 5014 people, Of which 1691 were boys and girls 3323 people; 2010 5107 people, including boys 1725 people, girls 3382 people; 2011 5774, of whom 1851 were boys, Girls 3923 people; 2012 5597, of who

11、m 1669 were boys and girls 3928 people. The overall age of 15-23 years old.</p><p>　　1.2 Methods</p><p>　　Using Mental Health Personality Questionnaire 1 (University Per-sonality Inventory, UPI)

12、 tool for the investigation, the questionnaire contains 64 questions, which The first is the measured pseudo 5,20,35,50 title, the first (61-64) for the secondary theme, the rest 56 questions, each question a points scor

13、e between 0-56 points, the higher the score description heart</p><p>　　The more serious management problems. UPI screening classification criteria are as follows: The first category is satisfying Column one

14、of those conditions: UPI score ≥25 points; the first 25 questions answered affirmatively; secondary</p><p>　　There are at least two problems at the same time make sure to answer questions. The second categor

15、y is the following conditions One by: score between 20-24 points; the first title to make sure the election 8,16,26 Optional; there is a problem in the secondary question affirmatively choose. Does not belong to the firs

16、t and second class were the first Three. The first category may have serious psychological problems, there may be a second class General psychological problems, the third category is</p><p>　　1.3Statistical

17、Analysis</p><p>　　Data were analyzed using SPSS16.0.</p><p>　　The results</p><p>　　UPI screening overall classification</p><p>　　Form 1All grades UPI screening classifi

18、cation results</p><p>　　As can be seen from Table 1, a class of students screened out at 6.95% distribution rate Between -8.38%, significantly higher than the four years 2010 2012 (p = 0.005), which He was n

19、o significant difference between the year of mental health from poor to good for, 2010 Class, 2009, 2011, 2012. II students sieve out ratio There was no significant difference between 2011 and 2012 between 11.99% -20.54%

20、 2009 was significantly higher than that of 2010 (p <0.001), 2010 significantly higher than the 2</p><p>　　Comparison of the total score for each grade UPI</p><p>　　Form 2All grades UPI score

21、s of descriptive statistics</p><p>　　UPI average and standard score difference of all freshmen in Table 2, comparing the Grade scores are significantly different (F = 81.81, p <0.001), change over time Do

22、wnward trend of the show.</p><p>　　Key topics differences in gender, age, on admission</p><p>　　Form 3Sex differences in analysis of different age groups </p><p>　　admission analyze

23、 key issues</p><p>　　Table 3 shows that in the four key questions 8,15,25,26, gender differences Significantly, significantly worse than boys and girls. Will be divided into three age groups, less than 18 ye

24、ars For the first group, the normal school age and that is not less than 18 years or less 19 The age of the second group, more than 19 years for the third group, comparing the three age groups Differences in the four que

25、stions. In the eighth title "unfortunate", the older age group (> 19 Years old) to be signific</p><p>　　(<18 years) was significantly better than the other two groups; in the first 25 questio

26、ns "wanted to commit suicide" normal Age group (18-19 years old) was significantly better than the other two groups; in the first 26 questions each year There were no significant differences between age groups.

27、 Newborn admission can be divided into one, two, Three, to compare the differences in admission in question 4. In the eighth title "is Unfortunately, "and the first 26 questions," lack of interest ",

28、the</p><p>　　Differences.</p><p>　　Ranked in the top ten four-issue projects</p><p>　　Form 4 UPI freshmen ranked in the top ten of psychological problems</p><p>　　As ca

29、n be seen from Table 4, between four freshmen reflected the psychological ask Problem is relatively concentrated, a slight change in the individual topics, mainly in the "love of The purpose of marriage is to "

30、increase the number of the affirmative answer," to care about dirty "and The number of "Love to worry about," the slightly reduced. For secondary question of affirmative response rate is extremely hig

31、h, 1,2,3,7 were ranked in the first place.</p><p><b>　　Discuss</b></p><p>　　Freshmen overall mental health status</p><p>　　Through four years of longitudinal comparative

32、 study, UPI screening rates in a class of students Between 6.95% -8.38%, two types of student screening rate of 11.99% -20.54% Room. Compare 2009 with 2010 vertical deviation, there may be the case with admission Some co

33、ntact, higher admission line pressure may be more to their students. Previous phase Off The results show that a class of students in the detection rate of 11.35% -21.05%, two Students detection rate of 16.09% -34.09%. Co

34、mpared speakin</p><p>　　Focus on a few specific groups freshman class</p><p>　　First, the boys feel unfortunate past, often insomnia, have suicidal thoughts And the lack of interest rate signifi

35、cantly higher than the number of girls. Financial institutions often Appear in the overall proportion of gender imbalance, showing women more than men and less the case, so Pay attention to the boy's mental health is

36、sues is particularly important. Secondly, more than 19 years into the Students learn more feel is unfortunate, and there are more suicide Idea; less than 18 years old en</p><p>　　More. It can be seen in olde

37、r freshmen may have had unusual people Student experience, such as illness, video and so on, they have a greater psychological shadow Sound, need extra attention; and young freshmen may not mind Cooked, the situation Des

38、tructive Enthusiasm, their ideas should also be a teacher understanding and off Note. Finally, two students showed a lack of interest and more on their own do not feel Fortunately, this can be in the middle ground with t

39、hem, there are a lot of unknowns</p><p>　　Focus on several types of psychological concerns</p><p>　　Comprehensive view of four freshmen year focused psychological problems can be divided into th

40、e following several Aspects: first, the interpersonal relationships, relationships that are important to care about him People's views, as well as attention to the people around; second, love and sexual aspects, refl

41、ecting the Openness and accountability; third, forcing tendency reflected in the dirty really care, repeatedly Confirmation and worry about love; fourth, the lack of patience. When these pro</p><p>　　Suggest

42、ions and Strategies</p><p>　　In recent years, our school freshman psychology successive census carried out work for the establishment of Archives and psychology student mental health education provides a ric

43、h data support Holders, but also for the psychological problems of students played an important role in prevention. Polytechnic mind To carry out the process for the boys as well as pay attention to school age is too lar

44、ge or too small new Health and mental health. Widespread problem for college students to carry out psy</p><p>　　大學(xué)生心理健康水平狀況縱向研究</p><p>　　——以某財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)為例</p><p><b>　　李喆君</b>&l

45、t;/p><p>　　摘要目的：為了解近年來(lái)財(cái)經(jīng)類大學(xué)新生的心理健康的總體情況及變化趨勢(shì)。方法：采用大學(xué)生人格問卷（UPI）對(duì)南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)2009級(jí)~2012級(jí)新生共計(jì)21492人進(jìn)行測(cè)試。結(jié)果：學(xué)生心理健康狀況逐年呈良性健康發(fā)展，可能存在嚴(yán)重心理問題的學(xué)生占當(dāng)年入學(xué)新生的比率在6.95%~8.38%之間，可能存在心理問題的學(xué)生比率在11.99%~20.54%之間；在關(guān)鍵題項(xiàng)上，男生比率顯著高于女生（p<0.0

46、5），大齡和低齡入學(xué)新生比率顯著高于正常年齡（p<0.05），二本新生比率顯著高于一本和三本新生（p<0.05）；各級(jí)新生排名前10位的心理問題較為一致。結(jié)論：要堅(jiān)持做好新生心理普查工作，并完善心理健康教育的各項(xiàng)工作，對(duì)于重點(diǎn)人群給予特別關(guān)注。</p><p>　　關(guān)鍵詞：大學(xué)生心理健康UPI縱向研究</p><p>　　為全面了解大學(xué)生的心理健康狀況，建立學(xué)生心理檔案，

47、做到心理問題的早發(fā)現(xiàn)、早干預(yù)、早治療，我校從2009年起開始對(duì)新生進(jìn)行網(wǎng)上心理普查，獲得了更加全面準(zhǔn)確的數(shù)據(jù)資料。為了解近年來(lái)大學(xué)新生心理健康狀況的總體情況及變化趨勢(shì)，本研究將對(duì)2009-2012年的數(shù)據(jù)資料進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析。</p><p><b>　　1 研究對(duì)象及方法</b></p><p><b>　　1.1 研究對(duì)象</b></p&g

48、t;<p>　　以南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)2009級(jí)-2012級(jí)歷年參加新生心理普查的有效問卷21492份作為研究對(duì)象。2009級(jí)5014人，其中男生1691人，女生3323人；2010級(jí)5107人，其中男生1725人，女生3382人；2011級(jí)5774人，其中男生1851人，女生3923人；2012級(jí)5597人，其中男生1669人，女生3928人?？傮w年齡15-23歲。</p><p><b>　　

49、1.2 研究方法</b></p><p>　　采用大學(xué)生心理健康人格調(diào)查問卷1（University Per-sonality Inventory，UPI）為調(diào)查工具，該問卷包含64題，其中第5、20、35、50為測(cè)偽題，第61、62、63、64為輔助題，其余的56題，每題1分，總分在0-56分之間，分?jǐn)?shù)越高說(shuō)明心理問題越嚴(yán)重。UPI的篩查分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn)如下：第一類為滿足下列條件之一者：UPI總分≥25分；

50、第25題作肯定回答；輔助</p><p>　　題中同時(shí)至少有2題做肯定回答。第二類為滿足下列條件之一者：總分介于20-24分之間；第8、16、26 題做肯定選擇。輔助題中有1題做肯定選擇。不屬于第一、二類者為第三類。其中第一類可能存在嚴(yán)重心理問題，第二類可能存在一般心理問題，第三類為心理健康者。</p><p>　　用心海軟件網(wǎng)上進(jìn)行統(tǒng)一施測(cè)，每年均在入學(xué)后的第二個(gè)月進(jìn)行，每次在一周內(nèi)完成

51、測(cè)評(píng)。</p><p><b>　　1.3 統(tǒng)計(jì)分析</b></p><p>　　采用SPSS16.0對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析。</p><p><b>　　2 結(jié)果</b></p><p>　　2.1UPI篩查分類的總體情況</p><p>　　從表1可以看出，一類學(xué)生的篩出比率分布

52、在6.95%-8.38%之間，四年間2010級(jí)顯著高于2012級(jí)（p=0.005），其他年份之間均無(wú)顯著差異，心理健康水平從差到好為，2010級(jí)、2009級(jí)、2011級(jí)、2012級(jí)。二類學(xué)生的篩出比率在11.99%-20.54%之間，2011級(jí)與2012級(jí)之間無(wú)顯著差異，2009級(jí)顯著高于2010級(jí)（p<0.001）,2010級(jí)顯著高于2011級(jí)（p<0.001）可以看出，2012級(jí)新生的心理健康水平最高，而2009級(jí)和20

53、10級(jí)都較差。從咨詢經(jīng)歷來(lái)看，四年間未發(fā)生顯著變化，曾經(jīng)接受過(guò)心理咨詢的學(xué)生比率在0.63%-0.78%之間，數(shù)量較少。</p><p>　　2.2各年級(jí)UPI總分的比較</p><p>　　各年級(jí)新生的UPI總分平均數(shù)及標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差見表2，比較各年級(jí)分?jǐn)?shù)都存在顯著差異（F=81.81，p<0.001），隨時(shí)間的變化呈下降的趨勢(shì)。</p><p>　　2.3關(guān)鍵題目

54、在性別、年齡、錄取分?jǐn)?shù)上的差異</p><p>　　由表3可見，在8、15、25、26四道關(guān)鍵題上，性別差異均顯著，男生顯著差于女生。將年齡分成三組，小于18歲的為第一組，正常入學(xué)年齡段即大于等于18歲且小于等于19歲的為第二組，大于19歲的為第三組，比較這三個(gè)年齡組在4題上的差異。在第8題“不幸的”上，大年齡組（>19歲）要顯著差于另外兩組；在第16題“常失眠”上小年齡組（<18歲）要顯著好于其他兩

55、組；在第25題“想輕生”上正常年齡組（18-19歲）要顯著好于他兩組；在第26題上各年齡組沒有顯著差異。新生的錄取分?jǐn)?shù)線可分為一本、二本、三本比較不同錄取分?jǐn)?shù)線在4題上的差異。在第8題“是不幸的”和第26題“缺乏興趣”上，本學(xué)生都顯著差于一本及三本學(xué)生；第16和15題在不同錄取分?jǐn)?shù)線上均無(wú)顯著差異。</p><p>　　2.4四年中排名前十的問題項(xiàng)目</p><p>　　由表4可以看出，四

56、年間大學(xué)新生所反映出的心理問題相對(duì)集中，在個(gè)別題目上略有變 化，主要表現(xiàn)在“戀愛的目的是為了婚姻”作肯定回答的人數(shù)增加，“對(duì)臟很在乎”和“愛操心”的人數(shù)略有減少。對(duì)于輔助題的肯定回答率極高，分別排在了第1、2、3、7位。

57、 3.討論

58、 </p><p>　　通過(guò)四年的縱向?qū)Ρ妊芯?，UPI一類學(xué)生篩查率在6.95%-8.38%之間，二類學(xué)生篩查率在11.99%-20.54%之間?？v向比較2009與2010級(jí)偏差，可能與錄取分?jǐn)?shù)情況有一定聯(lián)系，較高的錄取線帶給學(xué)生壓力可能更大。以往的相關(guān)研究結(jié)果顯示，一類學(xué)生的檢出率為11.35%-21.05%，二

59、類學(xué)生的檢出率為16.09%-34.09%。相比較來(lái)說(shuō)，我校的一類學(xué)生檢出率明顯偏低，二類學(xué)生檢出率除2009年以外，都較其他學(xué)校偏低，說(shuō)明我校入學(xué)新生的心理健康狀況符合常態(tài)7，且總體呈良性發(fā)展。這與生源及學(xué)科可能存在一定關(guān)系，我校為財(cái)經(jīng)類院校，學(xué)生多數(shù)來(lái)自于蘇皖地區(qū)，多數(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)條件相對(duì)較好，并且與家鄉(xiāng)距離不遠(yuǎn)交通方便，都為新生入學(xué)的心理適應(yīng)營(yíng)造了一個(gè)較好的環(huán)境。隨著對(duì)心理健康認(rèn)識(shí)的逐漸深入和關(guān)注度的提高，學(xué)生心理健康水平也是在逐漸改善的

60、。而針對(duì)一、二類學(xué)生的關(guān)注也是心理工</p><p><b>　　作開展的重要部分。</b></p><p>　　3.2著重關(guān)注的幾類特殊群體新生</p><p>　　首先，男生感覺自己過(guò)去不幸、常常失眠、有輕生想法和缺乏興趣的人數(shù)比率明顯高于女生。財(cái)經(jīng)類院校往往會(huì)出現(xiàn)在總體性別上的比例失調(diào)，呈現(xiàn)女多男少的情況，所以要關(guān)注男生的心理健康問題尤為

61、重要。其次，大于19歲入學(xué)的學(xué)生會(huì)更多的感到自己是不幸的，并且有更多的輕生想法；小于18歲入學(xué)的在睡眠上更好，但輕生的想法也較多。由此可以看出大齡入學(xué)的新生可能曾有過(guò)不平常的人生經(jīng)歷，比如生病、復(fù)讀等，對(duì)他們的心理產(chǎn)生了較大的影響，需要格外的關(guān)注；而低齡入學(xué)的新生可能存在心智不成熟、拔苗助長(zhǎng)的情況，他們的想法也應(yīng)得到老師的了解與關(guān)注。最后，二本學(xué)生表現(xiàn)出更多的缺乏興趣和對(duì)自己感到不幸，這可能與他們處于中間地帶，在選擇上有很多未知和迷茫有

62、關(guān)，在日常的教育中需要加以引導(dǎo)，逐漸地培養(yǎng)興趣并且找到自己的方向。</p><p>　　3.3著重關(guān)注的幾類心理問題</p><p>　　統(tǒng)觀4年大學(xué)新生集中的心理問題，可以分為如下幾個(gè)方面：第一，人際關(guān)系方面，覺得人際關(guān)系很重要，在意他人的看法，以及關(guān)注周圍的人；第二，戀愛與性方面，體現(xiàn)出開放性與責(zé)任感；第三，強(qiáng)迫傾向，體現(xiàn)在對(duì)臟很在乎、反復(fù)確認(rèn)以及愛操心；第四，缺乏耐心。這些問題具有較

63、強(qiáng)的時(shí)代特征，與社會(huì)環(huán)境、家庭教育等方面有一定關(guān)系，這與以往的研究也有著相類似的結(jié)果6。這為心理健康教育工作提供了依據(jù)，同時(shí)也指出了工作的重點(diǎn)與方向。</p><p><b>　　3.4建議與對(duì)策</b></p><p>　　近年來(lái)，我校連續(xù)開展了新生心理的普查工作，為建立學(xué)生心理檔案與心理健康教育的開展提供了豐富的數(shù)據(jù)支持，也為心理問題學(xué)生的防范起到了重要的作用。在