版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、安徽大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文公訴權(quán)與檢察監(jiān)督關(guān)系研究姓名:趙琳琳申請學(xué)位級別:碩士專業(yè):訴訟法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:余經(jīng)林2010-04II Abstract All the same, we are not sure that whether procuratorial supervision can coordinate public prosecution power or not. What is the relationship between
2、 procuratorial supervision and public prosecution power? The relationship is inclusion or coordination? Are there any contradictions and conflicts between the two? This article analyzes different views about this relatio
3、nship, and then makes sure some definition. The essence of public prosecution is procuratorial supervision, and it is the important part of procuratorial supervision. But in practice, the procuratorate departments, in p
4、articular the public prosecution department's effect of supervision is not good. There are so many reasons. Firstly, the law is too abstract, narrow and lacks compelling force. Secondly, organization setting and staf
5、f scheming are unreasonable. Responsibilities between departments are unknown or overlapping. It causes so many problems, for example, redundant examination, low efficiency and so on. The number of prosecutors and worklo
6、ad are not in proportion. Some departments have big burden, others are more leisurely. Such as public prosecutors have huge stress and big burden facing to so many criminal cases. Thirdly, public prosecutors do not like
7、to supervise and dare to supervise because they lack supervise consciousness and capability. At last, civil procedure and administrative procedure supervision is weak because of understaffed situation and unestablished p
8、ublic prosecution in civil and administrative action. Therefore, in order to improve procuratorial supervision, we should separate the right of public prosecution, investigation supervision and judicial supervision, and
9、at the same time entrust procuratorate the right of public prosecution in civil action and administrative action. Firstly, rename the department of public prosecution to criminal public prosecution. Divide the department
10、 of civil procedure and administrative procedure supervision into two: the department of civil procedure supervision and the department of administrative procedure supervision. Secondly, within departments, we should est
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 公訴權(quán)與自訴權(quán)關(guān)系研究.pdf
- 檢察官、公訴權(quán)與公訴制度改革.pdf
- 檢察機(jī)關(guān)刑事公訴權(quán)與刑事監(jiān)督權(quán)分離問題研究.pdf
- 民事公訴權(quán)研究.pdf
- 行政公訴權(quán)研究.pdf
- 法律監(jiān)督權(quán)與公訴權(quán)分離之思考.pdf
- 公訴權(quán)自由裁量研究.pdf
- 公訴權(quán)理論新探.pdf
- 刑事公訴權(quán)性質(zhì)研究.pdf
- 公訴權(quán)與審判范圍關(guān)系研究——兼論法院變更起訴問題.pdf
- 論公訴權(quán)對自訴權(quán)的整合.pdf
- 積極公訴權(quán)制約機(jī)制研究.pdf
- 公訴權(quán)的性質(zhì)與公訴制度改革探析.pdf
- 公訴權(quán)制約論.pdf
- 民事公益訴訟研究——兼論檢察機(jī)關(guān)民事公訴權(quán)的構(gòu)建.pdf
- 刑事公訴中的訴權(quán)問題研究.pdf
- 提起公訴權(quán)制約機(jī)制研究.pdf
- 我國公訴權(quán)的屬性研究.pdf
- 公訴權(quán)權(quán)限的法理分析.pdf
- 論刑事公訴權(quán)的配置.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論