版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文集團(tuán)訴訟在中國(guó)證券侵權(quán)民事訴訟中的適用性研究姓名:彭韡莢申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專(zhuān)業(yè):國(guó)際法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:丁丁20080401IIAbstract “The Questions Concerning the Acceptance of Civil Tort Dispute Cases Arising from False Representation in the Securities Market Circular
2、” and “Several Regulations Concerning Trying Civil Compensation Cases Arising from False Representation in the Securities Market” promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court has expressly excluded the application of both c
3、lass action and representative action with undetermined number of participants in the security civil torts procedure of China. The aforesaid judicial interpretations have triggered lots of arguments on the mode of securi
4、ty civil torts procedure of China. Among the voices against bringing security class action into China, one of the most important reasons is that the Civil Procedure Law of the People s Republic of China has not provided
5、necessary legal basis for the application of class action in China. However, relevant issues were not involved in the amendment of the Civil Procedure Law in the year 2007, which shows that there are still deeper-level r
6、easons hidden behind the Supreme People’s Court’s refusal to adopt class action in the security civil torts procedure. Based on introduction of the present modes of security civil torts procedure of China and the cla
7、ss action system, making use of the research tools of law and economics, this thesis firstly analyzes whether it is more efficient to adopt class action than to adopt other modes of litigation from both macro and micro p
8、erspectives by cost-benefit analysis, and comes to a positive conclusion. Secondly, using empirical research methods of sociology of law and the research tools of comparative law, taking sociology of law as point of vi
9、ew,this thesis further studies the Chinese social context’s affect on the applicability of class action system in the security civil torts procedure of China from aspects of investor protection, stock structure, level of
10、 economic development, legal tradition and political factors etc. On the basis of the research above, reflecting the inherent defects of economic analysis and considering the particular context of China’s securities mar
11、ket, social culture and political and legal system, commencing from the necessity and possibility of bringing class action into the security civil torts procedure of China and aiming at the overall situation,the author d
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 民事訴訟中推定適用研究.pdf
- 連帶債務(wù)在民事訴訟中的適用研究.pdf
- 證券侵權(quán)民事訴訟方式研究.pdf
- 抵銷(xiāo)權(quán)在民事訴訟中的適用問(wèn)題研究.pdf
- 論測(cè)謊結(jié)論在民事訴訟中的適用.pdf
- 淺議民事訴訟中的虛假訴訟
- 論民事訴訟中鑒定意見(jiàn)的適用.pdf
- 經(jīng)驗(yàn)法則在民事訴訟中的適用.pdf
- 國(guó)際民事訴訟中臨時(shí)措施的適用研究
- 民事訴訟中電子數(shù)據(jù)適用問(wèn)題研究.pdf
- 民事訴訟中逾期舉證的司法適用.pdf
- 證券侵權(quán)民事訴訟原告制度研究.pdf
- 醫(yī)療侵權(quán)民事訴訟中的舉證責(zé)任研究.pdf
- 民事訴訟中經(jīng)驗(yàn)法則的適用研究.pdf
- 論民間規(guī)則在民事訴訟中的適用.pdf
- 民事訴訟中的認(rèn)證.pdf
- 論民事訴訟中的小額訴訟程序.pdf
- 民事訴訟中的陷阱取證
- 我國(guó)民事訴訟中電子數(shù)據(jù)適用問(wèn)題研究.pdf
- 民事訴訟中的供求概說(shuō)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論