我國群體訴訟制度研究.pdf

1、復(fù)旦大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文我國群體訴訟制度研究姓名：施立功申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：法律指導(dǎo)教師：章武生20071022【摘要】我國代表人訴訟制度在實(shí)際運(yùn)行中存在的弊端已引起理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界的反思。筆者希望通過自己的研究，就完善我國的群體訴訟制度提出自己的構(gòu)想。全文共分四章，第一章著重闡述群體訴訟的概念、特征、并對群體訴訟的公正價值和效益價值進(jìn)行分析：第二章分別介紹美國的集團(tuán)訴訟、日本的選定當(dāng)事人訴訟、德國的團(tuán)體訴訟的特點(diǎn)，在此基礎(chǔ)上比較分析我國

2、代表人訴訟制度與國外群體訴訟制度的異同，揭示我國的代表人訴訟借鑒了日本選定當(dāng)事人制度的訴訟代表制，同時又對選定當(dāng)事人制度加以改造吸收的內(nèi)在特征：第三章分析我國群體訴訟制度及其運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀。客觀的指出我國代表人訴訟存在的價值意義后，重點(diǎn)分析我國群體訴訟運(yùn)行中存在的弊端；第四章提出筆者的主張：通過借鑒國外已成熟的群體訴訟制度并結(jié)合我國在群體訴訟方面已取得經(jīng)驗(yàn)，重構(gòu)我國的群體訴訟制度?！娟P(guān)鍵詞】群體訴訟集團(tuán)訴訟代表人訴訟重構(gòu)[中圖分類號】D925

3、1[Abstract]ThedefectsofChina’Srepresentativelawsuitsystem，whichexistsinitsoperation，havecausedreflectionsbyboththetheoristsandpractitionersinthelegalcircleTheauthorhopedthroughownresearchconsummatesourcountry’acommunityI

4、awsuitsystemtoproposeownconceptionThefuIItextaItogetherdiVidesfourchaptersThefirstchapterexpoundsthedefinition，featuresofcommunitylawsuit，andconductsallanalysisoffairvalueandeffectivenessofcommunitylawsuitChapter11analyz

5、esofthefeaturesoftheUScommunitylawsuittheJapanesepartyspecifiedlawsuitandtheGermanycommunitylawsuitBasedOnthis，chapterIImakesacomparativeanalysisofthesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenChina’Srepresentativelawsuitsystemand

6、theoverseascommunitylawsuitsystemanddiscoverstheessentialfeaturesofChina’Srepresentativelawsuitsystem：itabsorbedideasfromJapaneseparty—specifiedlawsuitsystemandadaptedtheJapanesesystemforitsownu∞ChapterIIIanalyzesChina’s

7、currentcommunitylawsuitsystemanditsstatusquoAfteranobjectiveanalysisofChina’SrepresentativethischapterfocusesontheanalysisofthedefectsinChina’ScommunitylawsuitsystemChapterIVanalyzesthefeasibilityandnecessityofabsorbingt

8、heUScommunitylawsuitsystemandpresentstheauthor’Sidea：toUSetheUScommunitylawsuitsystemandtheGermanycommunitylawsuitsystemforreferencetoimproveChina’Scommunitylawsuitsystem[Keywords]thegrouplitigation，groupdisputerepresent