版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文淺議中國(guó)民事訴訟中的司法能動(dòng)性理念姓名:馮志敏申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):法律碩士指導(dǎo)教師:齊海濱2011-05-21II華 中 科 技 大 學(xué) 碩 士 學(xué) 位 論 文 Abstract In the field of civil procedural, the dispute between judicial restraint and judicial activism is a l
2、ong affair. The former, aims to realize the stability and authority embodied in the law; the latter, aims to ensure the economy and efficiency embodied in the law. Present day, it will cause
3、 the party overactive or the court overactive if we purely use judicial restraint or judicial activism. And these two ways have no beneficial effect to solve some difficult problems such as
4、Litigation explosion, Litigation delay, Litigation raid, Litigation fraud, and the abuse of the right to sue. However, the harmonious blend of these two judicial philosophies has been a consensu
5、s between British- American legal system and the continental legal system. In British- American legal system, judicial activism has been a doctrine school as milestone for a long time. It lays s
6、tress on weaking precedent in the law .And in the continental legal system, the idea of judicial activism goes back to time immemorial. It emphasizes that court and judge should give full pl
7、ay to initiative ability, service ability and efficiency ability in the litigation process of civil case. Only in this way, can the issue be solved completely and efficiently. In China, the i
8、dea of judicial activism was put forward by the Supreme People's Court in August, 2009. This paper consists of 5 parts, and in the following the situation of study about judicial activism,
9、the concept of judicial activism, the content of judicial activism, the necessity and feasibility of judicial activism, and suggestion to perfect it will be analyzed successively. In the first p
10、art,the situation of study about judicial activism.In the second part, comparing the Judicial Activism with the principle of activism is the chief content. The conception and characteristics of
11、Judicial Activism are considered as the chief unit of analysis to construct the connotation appearance of Judicial Activism.And the history of Judicial Activism is analyzed. In the third part,
12、the content of judicial activism is stated. In the fourth part, the necessity and feasibility of judicial activism.In the fifth part,some suggestions enriching and perfecting Judicial Activism in
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 論民事訴訟中的司法能動(dòng)性.pdf
- 淺議民事訴訟中的虛假訴訟
- 對(duì)我國(guó)民事訴訟中司法救助制度構(gòu)建之思考.pdf
- 我國(guó)民事訴訟中的懸賞取證.pdf
- 民事訴訟中逾期舉證的司法適用.pdf
- 我國(guó)民事訴訟中調(diào)解制度研析.pdf
- 試析我國(guó)民事訴訟中的調(diào)解制度
- 淺析我國(guó)民事訴訟中的調(diào)解制度
- 論我國(guó)民事訴訟中的釋明制度.pdf
- 論我國(guó)民事訴訟中的罰款制度.pdf
- 我國(guó)民事訴訟中的“新的證據(jù)”.pdf
- 淺談我國(guó)民事訴訟中的舉證制度
- 論我國(guó)民事訴訟中的檢察權(quán).pdf
- 論我國(guó)民事訴訟中的證明妨礙.pdf
- 我國(guó)民事訴訟中電子數(shù)據(jù)的采用.pdf
- 民事訴訟中的司法認(rèn)知:?jiǎn)栴}與前瞻.pdf
- 民事訴訟中的認(rèn)證.pdf
- 淺議民事訴訟中的適格當(dāng)事人
- 論我國(guó)民事訴訟中的先行調(diào)解制度.pdf
- 論我國(guó)民事訴訟中證人制度的完善.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論