【中英雙語】422關(guān)于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論公眾意見領(lǐng)袖有關(guān)的外文文獻(xiàn)翻譯成品：大學(xué)生網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿情羊群效應(yīng)的作用機理及影響因素（中英文雙語對照）

1、此文檔是畢業(yè)設(shè)計外文翻譯成品（ 含英文原文+中文翻譯） ，無需調(diào)整復(fù)雜的格式！下載之后直接可用，方便快捷！本文價格不貴,也就幾十塊錢！一輩子也就一次的事！外文標(biāo)題：The Mechanism and Influencing Factors of Herding Effect ofCollege Students’ Network Public Opinion外文作者：Hu Xia, ZhangYan and An Bowen文獻(xiàn)出處:

2、Anthropologist, 23(1,2): 226-230 (2018) (如覺得年份太老，可改為近 2 年，畢竟很多畢業(yè)生都這樣做)英文 2872 單詞，18607 字符(字符就是印刷符)，中文 4295 漢字。 （如果字?jǐn)?shù)多了，可自行刪減，大多數(shù)學(xué)校都是要求選取外文的一部分內(nèi)容進行翻譯的。 ）The Mechanism and Influencing Factors of Herding Effect of College S

3、tudents’ Network Public OpinionKEYWORDS Behavior. Internet Public Opinion. Network. Survey. University Students. WeChatABSTRACT：This study investigated the mechanism and influencing factors of herding effect in network p

4、ublic opinion of college students. Experiments by controlling sources of ideas and the strength of concern explore how college students process information of public opinion on the network. To explore factors that influe

5、nce college students generating herding effect in the public opinion on the network, questionnaires and data test were used. The result shows that herding effect is the result of consensus heuristic and competence heuris

6、tic. On the other hand, various sources of information, which are from either the majority or experts, have equal impact on college students’ herding effect in network public opinion. Besides, college students’ knowledge

7、 structure is not significant to generate herding effect. On the contrary, gender, geography and original opinions have a significant impact on the generation of herding.In order to determine variable factors in the main

8、 research, this study was aimed at finding out which concerning point of social issues attracted most attention of college students by means of doing survey. Two hundred ten college students accepted the survey, includin

9、g 107 males and 103 females. The mean age was 20.32 years. Two hundred ten participants received questionnaires. One hundred ninety questionnaires were returned and these questionnaires were valid. The effective rate was

10、 90.48 percent. Statistical data about concerning perspective of college students showed that, by comparison, emotional aspects such as family and friends were more concerned than environmental protection, when talking a

11、bout social issues. Accordingly, relatives and friends were treated as strong view aspects and the environment was a weak point of view. On the basic of data gained before, questionnaires were made afterwards.Purpose of

12、the ResearchTo explore processing methods of herding in public opinion, this research manipulated variables including sources of information and concerning degree of topics. In addition, survey and data analysis were use

13、d in order to explore influencing factors in herding.SubjectsOne hundred ninety college students were subjects, including 111 males and 79 females. The mean age was 21.35.MaterialsNews (netizens grabbed red envelope on W

14、eChat on New Year’s Eve) and simulated scenarios with 2 sorts of opinions on 4 types of questionnaires.Research DesignThe first part of questionnaire using 2 (Source: netizens or experts) 2 (concerning point: strong, wea

15、k) between-subject design. 200 subjects were divided into four groups. In order to explore which combination was easier to change people’s perspective, in the first part of the questionnaire, the study first investigated