版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文工程合理性與工程倫理初探姓名:靳博申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:陳剛20070530IIAbstract From viewpoints of rationality and ethics, this thesis tries to find a way in which engineering activities can be practiced harmoniously in modern
2、society. At first, the characters of modern engineering are discussed. According to the characters, the practice rationality of engineering is explained .The conclusion was made as follows: Engineering activities are pr
3、ocession of practices which integrate knowledge of science and technology with human culture value and ethics ,moreover ,rational engineering activities are processes, which embody the science and technology value and et
4、hics value . The engineering rationality includes purpose rationality and ethics value rationality in engineering practices, and they are essential conditions and main restricted restrict causes for engineering developme
5、nt. Then, this paper introduces two research roads of current engineering ethics (including macro-engineering ethics and micro- engineering ethics) and principles of ethics in engineering ,discusses some ethics problems
6、 in engineering practice ,and emphasizes the importance of ethics and profession morals in profession community . At last, the forming and developing process of engineers’ professional ethics is analyzed .Synthetic socia
7、l contracts (an ethics theory) is introduced, and the regulation road of engineering ethics is put forward . Key words:engineering rationality engineering ethics synthetic social contracts standardization and instit
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 工程合理性與工程倫理初探.pdf
- 規(guī)避法律的合理性初探
- 教育倫理體系合理性研究.pdf
- 哈貝馬斯的合理性思想初探
- 試論社會(huì)工程存在的合理性.pdf
- 哈貝馬斯的合理性思想初探
- 建筑工程造價(jià)合理性管理探究
- 學(xué)校布局調(diào)整的合理性初探.pdf
- 哈貝馬斯的商談倫理及其合理性維度
- 新增工程造價(jià)的確定與價(jià)款約定合理性探討
- 貿(mào)易政策合理性的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)初探.
- 關(guān)于市政工程給排水設(shè)計(jì)合理性研究
- 公路工程造價(jià)范圍合理性評(píng)價(jià)研究.pdf
- 法治的合理性——社會(huì)契約論的倫理訴求.pdf
- 自由與行為的合理性.pdf
- 量刑的合理性.pdf
- 論技術(shù)合理性.pdf
- 對(duì)于工程預(yù)算存在的問題及合理性分析
- 藥物應(yīng)用合理性點(diǎn)評(píng)
- 工具合理性的價(jià)值及其局限——諾奇克合理性理論探析
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論