版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、湖南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文法權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)論:權(quán)力與權(quán)利互動的分析框架姓名:趙平萍申請學(xué)位級別:碩士專業(yè):法學(xué)理論指導(dǎo)教師:陳秋云20070415IIAbstract It is commonly acknowledged that as two forms in the ‘living world’ of humans, power and right have become operation of experience and interact
2、ive with each other. However, due to complexity in life and the fact that domains of power and right in public and private areas in traditional sense have been broken and penetrated into each other, distinction between p
3、ower and right has been blurred in practice and hard to be recognized in theory. Therefore, from the perspective of jurisprudence, we need to give a clear answer as to how to redigest and clarify the interactive relation
4、 between power and right and its evolvement. 'Theory of Relation between Power and Right’ is an analytical framework established to expound interaction between power and right. The relation between power and right r
5、efers to their interactive relation, organically composed of subject recognition, legal provisions and actual manifestation. Power and right are mutually intrusive in their traditional relation but interactive in their m
6、odern one. The modern interactive relation is manifested in three layers, namely ought-to-be state, legal state and actual state. Its main three characteristics lie in power’s pluralism and systematical description of ‘o
7、riginal power’, system construction of right’s autonomy and normalization, and flourish of social power and right and construction of restriction system. Because ‘problemization’ is a process to find clue to and seek fo
8、r theoretical problems from the common sense in daily life, common sense in daily life consequently becomes the resource of debating problemization. Common sense is oriental to problems and is the vital and the only entr
9、ance to theory; hence, what we can see as the ‘harmonious society’ in our ‘living world’ becomes the ‘existent’ to verify the theory of power and right. The analysis of the theory of power and right aims to debate the co
10、mmon sense, and the first step is to question ‘harmonious society’ and make a clear distinction from it after respecting, accepting and recognizing it, so that a special object of power and right research can be construc
11、ted, theoretical problems in the ‘harmonious society’ can be sorted out and the theory can be revealed in the common sense in the ‘harmonious society’ as the ‘existent’ to manifest the significance of ‘being existent’. F
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 論中央與地方關(guān)系中的司法權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化.pdf
- 論公民的刑事司法權(quán)利——屬性與體系的分析.pdf
- 論憲法權(quán)利與民事權(quán)利之關(guān)系——以憲法權(quán)利在民事領(lǐng)域的適用為線索.pdf
- 論以權(quán)利制約權(quán)力.pdf
- 論行政執(zhí)法中的權(quán)力與權(quán)利平衡.pdf
- 論憲法權(quán)利的行政訴訟救濟(jì).pdf
- 論經(jīng)濟(jì)法權(quán)利的司法救濟(jì)模式.pdf
- 論司法權(quán)的結(jié)構(gòu)與優(yōu)化.pdf
- 論執(zhí)法權(quán)力監(jiān)督的問題及其解決機(jī)制.pdf
- 論權(quán)利文化與憲法實施的互動關(guān)系.pdf
- 論我國刑事訴訟中律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利與司法權(quán)力的沖突.pdf
- 論憲法框架下中國司法權(quán)的獨立與監(jiān)督.pdf
- 出版自由與憲法權(quán)利的保障
- 行政調(diào)查中權(quán)利與權(quán)力平衡的法律分析.pdf
- 權(quán)利與權(quán)力的關(guān)系研究
- 兒童憲法權(quán)利研究.pdf
- 實現(xiàn)權(quán)力與權(quán)利的和諧統(tǒng)一——對權(quán)力與權(quán)利本質(zhì)關(guān)系的探尋與思考.pdf
- 規(guī)則下的權(quán)力與自由——司法與傳媒良性互動法律框架的構(gòu)建.pdf
- 私法權(quán)利的沖突研究.pdf
- 隱名股東權(quán)利保護(hù)研究——論“善意型”隱名股東的合法權(quán)利保障.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論