版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1392645Working Paper No. 33 The Crisis of Fair Value Accounting: Making Sense of the Recent Debate Christian Laux Goethe-University Frankfurt Christian Leuz The U
2、niversity of Chicago Booth School of Business Veron, 2008).3 In our view, there are problems with both positions. FVA is neither responsible for the crisis nor is it merely a measurement system that reports asset valu
3、es without having economic effects of its own. In this article, we attempt to make sense of the current fair-value debate and discuss whether many of the arguments in this debate hold up to further scrutiny. We come to
4、 the following four conclusions. First, much of the controversy about FVA results from confusion about what is new and different about FVA as well as different views about the purpose of FVA. In our view, the debate ab
5、out FVA takes us back to several old accounting issues, like the tradeoff between relevance and reliability, which have been debated for decades. Except in rare circumstances, standard setters will always face these iss
6、ues and tradeoffs; FVA is just another example. This insight is helpful to better understand some of the arguments brought forward in the debate. 1 Strictly speaking, FVA is broader than MTM accounting, as the latter
7、is only one way of determining the fair value. We therefore use the term FVA throughout unless we specifically mean marking to a market price. 2 For example, the American Bankers Association in its letter to the SEC
8、in September 2008 states: “The problems that exist in today’s financial markets can be traced to many different factors. One factor that is recognized as having exacerbated these problems is fair value accounting.” Sim
9、ilar concerns are also shared by the US Congress, which put a strong pressure on FASB to change the accounting rules. See also, e.g., Wallison (2008a, 2008b), Whalen (2008), and Forbes (2009). 3 A related but differ
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 外文翻譯--公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)的危機(jī)正確理解最近的辯論
- 外文翻譯--公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)的危機(jī)正確理解最近的辯論
- 公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)【外文翻譯】
- 外文翻譯--公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)和當(dāng)前金融危機(jī)(節(jié)選)
- 外文翻譯--公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)和經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)信號(hào)還是誘因?
- 公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)【外文翻譯】 (2)
- 6正確理解詞義
- 翻譯過程中如何正確理解原文
- 公允價(jià)值計(jì)量屬性的探析 外文翻譯(英文)--公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)在安然事件中的使用及其啟示(節(jié)選)
- 將金融危機(jī)歸咎于公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)公平嗎?【外文翻譯】
- 正確理解員工持股計(jì)劃
- 將金融危機(jī)歸咎于公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)是否公平?【外文翻譯】
- 正確理解精益生產(chǎn)
- 完全公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)時(shí)代的到來【外文翻譯】
- 會(huì)計(jì)專業(yè)外文翻譯----公允價(jià)值測(cè)量
- 正確理解檔案管理的社會(huì)功能
- 正確理解客人永遠(yuǎn)是對(duì)的
- 如何正確理解以“not”為中心的句子
- 如何正確理解精益生產(chǎn)
- 正確理解精益生產(chǎn)(20190321115904)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論