外文翻譯---最高審計機關(guān)的環(huán)境審計活動

1、<p>　　畢業(yè)論文外文文獻翻譯</p><p>　畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文）題目關(guān)于企業(yè)內(nèi)部環(huán)境績效審計的研究</p><p>　翻譯題目最高審計機關(guān)的環(huán)境審計活動</p><p>　學(xué) 院會計學(xué)院</p><p>　專 業(yè)會計學(xué)</p><p>　姓 名張軍芳</p><p&g

2、t;　班 級09020615</p><p>　學(xué) 號09027927</p><p>　指導(dǎo)教師何瑞雄</p><p>　　最高審計機關(guān)的環(huán)境審計活動</p><p>　　最高審計機關(guān)越來越多的活躍在環(huán)境審計領(lǐng)域。特別是1993-1996年期間，工作組已檢測到環(huán)境審計活動堅定的數(shù)量增長。首先，越來越多的最高審計機關(guān)已經(jīng)活躍在這個

3、領(lǐng)域。其次是積極的最高審計機關(guān)，甚至變得更加活躍：他們分配較大部分的審計資源給這類工作，同時出版更多環(huán)保審計報告。表1顯示了平均數(shù)字。然而，這里是機構(gòu)間差異較大。例如，環(huán)境報告的數(shù)量變化，每個審計機關(guān)從1到36份報告不等。</p><p>　　1996-1999年期間，結(jié)果是不那么容易詮釋。第一，活躍在環(huán)境審計領(lǐng)域的最高審計機關(guān)數(shù)量并沒有太大變化。 “活性基團”的組成沒有保持相同的：一些最高審計機關(guān)進入，而其他最

4、高審計機關(guān)離開了團隊。環(huán)境審計花費的時間量略有增加。二，但是，審計報告數(shù)量略有下降，1996年和1999年之間。這些數(shù)字可能反映了從量到質(zhì)的轉(zhuǎn)變。這個信號解釋了在過去三年從規(guī)律性審計到績效審計的轉(zhuǎn)變（1994-1996年，20％的規(guī)律性審計和44％績效審計;1997-1999：16％規(guī)律性審計和績效審計54％） 。在一般情況下，績效審計需要更多的資源。我們必須認(rèn)識到審計的范圍可能急劇變化。在將來，再將來開發(fā)一些其他方式去測算人們工作量而

5、不是計算通過花費的時間和發(fā)表的報告會是很有趣的。</p><p>　　在2000年，有62個響應(yīng)了最高審計機關(guān)并向工作組提供了更詳細的關(guān)于他們自1997年以來公布的工作信息。在1997-1999年，這62個最高審計機關(guān)公布的560個環(huán)境審計報告。當(dāng)然，這些報告反映了一個龐大的身軀，可用于其他機構(gòu)的經(jīng)驗。環(huán)境審計報告的參考書目可在網(wǎng)站上的最高審計機關(guān)國際組織的工作組看到。這里這個信息是用來給最高審計機關(guān)的審計工作的

6、內(nèi)容更多一些洞察。</p><p>　　自1997年以來，少數(shù)環(huán)境審計是規(guī)律性審計（560篇報告中有87篇，占16％）。大多數(shù)審計績效審計（560篇報告中有304篇，占54％），或組合的規(guī)律性和績效審計（560篇報告中有169篇，占30％）。如前文所述，績效審計是一個廣泛的概念。在實踐中，績效審計往往集中于環(huán)保計劃的實施（560篇報告中有264篇，占47％），符合國家環(huán)保法律，法規(guī)的，由政府部門，部委和/或其他機

7、構(gòu)的任務(wù)給訪問（560篇報告中有212篇，占38％）。此外，審計經(jīng)常被列入政府的環(huán)境管理系統(tǒng)（560篇報告中有156篇，占28％）。下面的元素得到了關(guān)注審計報告：影響或影響現(xiàn)有的國家環(huán)境計劃非環(huán)保項目對環(huán)境的影響;環(huán)境政策;由政府遵守國際義務(wù)和承諾的10％至20％。許多績效審計包括以上提到的要素之一。</p><p>　　環(huán)境政策和計劃，包括范圍廣泛的環(huán)境問題，而這樣做的審計報告。在上一次調(diào)查中，最常見的審計問題

8、是公共機構(gòu)或部門（162的560個報告，29%），淡水（131 560，</p><p>　　23%（103），廢560報告，18%），與自然和娛樂（102的560報告，18%）。這些最常見的主題是大致相同的世界各地。除了這些主題，吸引了許多其他問題中文全稱：海洋污染，空氣污染，氣候變化，土壤污染/污染的場所，環(huán)境和人類健康，減少噪音，生物多樣性生態(tài)系統(tǒng)管理，農(nóng)業(yè)，農(nóng)藥，災(zāi)難管理和應(yīng)急準(zhǔn)備，工業(yè)污染，礦物質(zhì)和天然

9、資源，挖掘，漁業(yè)，運輸，放射性，等等。</p><p>　　為了得到更好的理解最高審計機關(guān)在實踐中環(huán)境審計的工作，收集了有關(guān)水問題的50份報告。 “水”的主題，是因為它經(jīng)常被最高審計機關(guān)審核，并在過去的6年中，這是中心主題工作組內(nèi)的經(jīng)驗交流。收集的所有報告有不同的側(cè)重點。</p><p>　　一些處理財務(wù)的控制和管理問題，以及水的問題作為一個次要的主題。幾乎所有的報告都作為起點，如缺乏獲得

10、清潔水，或污染的河流和湖泊水的社會問題。為了讓環(huán)境審計在實踐中有一個廣泛的變化想法，下面給出一些例子進行簡要說明：</p><p>　　規(guī)律性審計的一個例子是中國最高審計機關(guān)（1999）進行污水處理廠，對營運資金的審計重點。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)，污水處理費水平低，工廠收到的補貼及營運資金提供給工廠之間存在相當(dāng)大的差距。中國最高審計機關(guān)建議，污水處理費應(yīng)逐步提高，以確保工廠的正常運作。</p><p>

11、　　以下是一個績效審計的例子：</p><p>　　符合“拉姆薩爾公約”關(guān)于保護濕地和兩個相關(guān)的歐盟指令是荷蘭最高審計機關(guān)（1999）的主題。在這次審計中，有關(guān)濕地也被列入國家環(huán)保計劃的實施。主要結(jié)果是荷蘭起草了許多的管理和恢復(fù)濕地的計劃，但這些計劃的實施在實踐中往往是有問題的或極其緩慢。由于操作性不足的國際義務(wù)，國家政策的自然管理部與地方政府簽訂協(xié)議，履行國際義務(wù)。因此，地方當(dāng)局非常了解客觀方面的義務(wù)。<

12、/p><p>　　在審計的賽埃及的預(yù)防污染對尼羅河（2000），遵守國家規(guī)章制度是最重要的一方面。審計的重點是遵守環(huán)境規(guī)則，法規(guī)，標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和保障保護尼羅河流域和其他新鮮水道，所采取的行動侵犯，和國家衛(wèi)生系統(tǒng)。</p><p>　　西的法國審計的污染水是用于人類消費（2002）。審計報告表明了困境可持續(xù)發(fā)展平衡的經(jīng)濟和社會目標(biāo)與環(huán)境目標(biāo)。主要的結(jié)論是，盡管公共支出審計1993以來，一直沒有顯著的改善

13、在水質(zhì)。本條例旨在調(diào)和水域的保護與農(nóng)業(yè)活動被忽視了贊成后者。此外，條例監(jiān)測的主要是很差為了避免意外污染和不污染擴散源。</p><p>　　在2000年，毛里求斯國家最高審計機關(guān)對泄漏飲用水儲存和配送系統(tǒng)進行了審計。這次審計的原因是大量去向不明的水（UFW）（在1998年和1999年生產(chǎn)總量的47％左右），導(dǎo)致“水強調(diào)”國家毛里求斯的分類。結(jié)合降雨，由2010年的20％以上，估計增加的食水需求的減少，構(gòu)成一個迫切

14、需要解決的問題的國家。這一短缺嚴(yán)重阻礙經(jīng)濟和社會發(fā)展。審計處認(rèn)為，如果UFW降低到2010年的35％的目標(biāo)可以實現(xiàn)，沒有其他主要水資源有被利用。 UFW高水平的原因主要是承包商表現(xiàn)不佳，監(jiān)測他們的工作不足，自來水公司，大量使用不合格的材料，普遍短缺，材料，設(shè)備，和熟練的勞動力，和有限的工作規(guī)范。最后一個例子是一個審計的西貢的美國狀態(tài)（2000），其中的重點是政策信息。西決定是否在信息國家水質(zhì)庫存的環(huán)境保護局（美國環(huán)保署）是可靠的和有代表

15、性的全國水質(zhì)條件。此外，它審查現(xiàn)有的數(shù)據(jù)，以確定它們是否是足以讓政府官員使密鑰管理決定水質(zhì)。</p><p>　　這是不可能的“水政策”，這些報告的基礎(chǔ)上制定的一般性結(jié)論。在科目和審計問題的變化太寬。當(dāng)然，這從來沒有去過這些審計的目的。然而，有一個元素，這似乎是一個中央政策的實施和組織問題：缺乏足夠和可靠的信息。錢上花的基本信息，活動的開展，輸出交付，取得的影響，可用于密鑰管理和政策決策，往往似乎沒有足夠的。這些

16、類型的問題進行鑒定，在幾乎所有的水的審計報告。</p><p>　　國際協(xié)議及與最高審計機構(gòu)的合作</p><p>　　環(huán)境問題在自然中通常是跨界的。例如：全球變暖，臭氧層耗竭，海洋污染，和自然資源的開發(fā)，如：石油、天然氣、熱帶森林的木材。再者，一些區(qū)域性問題：主要河流的水質(zhì)量問題，可持續(xù)利用魚類資源，和調(diào)查環(huán)境犯罪往往跨越邊界民族國家。因此，許多國家尋求國際合作解決環(huán)境問題。這導(dǎo)致了越來

17、越多的關(guān)于環(huán)境問題的國際協(xié)議。這些協(xié)議有：關(guān)于環(huán)境變化的京東協(xié)議書，瀕危動物植物的國際慣例，制定公約防止海洋船舶污染，巴塞爾公約控制越境轉(zhuǎn)移危險廢物，拉姆薩爾公約保護濕地，和生物多樣性公約。</p><p>　　協(xié)定成員國批準(zhǔn)后，各國政府負責(zé)實施的國際義務(wù)，在本國的政策方案和立法。最高審計機關(guān)可以通過審計促進國際環(huán)境合作與國際義務(wù)和承諾遵守本國政府。</p><p>　　世界審計組織環(huán)境審

18、計工作組想要刺激這種類型的審計，審核程序及國際協(xié)定的選擇提供指引。工作組已經(jīng)這樣做了，不僅因為審計本身可能是有用的，但也因為這些審計提供優(yōu)良的可能性的合作和最高審計機關(guān)之間的信息交換，審查共同問題，并分享具體審計項目的想法。</p><p>　　最高審計機關(guān)國際組織第一個指導(dǎo)交易的主題為“最高審計機關(guān)如何合作可能經(jīng)營的國際環(huán)保協(xié)議”（最高審計機關(guān)國際組織，1998年）的審計。最高審計機關(guān)國際組織的指導(dǎo)意見“標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和

19、環(huán)境審計指引”（最高審計機關(guān)國際組織，2001年）中的方法論問題得到了答復(fù)。在選擇環(huán)境協(xié)定審計前，工作小組對文件“國際環(huán)保協(xié)議的審計”（國際審計組織環(huán)境審計工作組，2001b）的交易與風(fēng)險進行了分析。</p><p>　　大多數(shù)最后問卷調(diào)查的回應(yīng)表明，他們樂意在不就的將來同其他國家的最高審計機構(gòu)就國家環(huán)境審計達成協(xié)議（76%，2102）。越來越多的國家最高審計機關(guān)已經(jīng)在環(huán)境領(lǐng)域的合作審計和/或與審計環(huán)境協(xié)議方面得

20、到了經(jīng)驗。幾個已經(jīng)聯(lián)合或協(xié)調(diào)的國家最高審計機關(guān)進行了審計海洋污染。合作主要發(fā)生在區(qū)域一級，他們共有一個水的對象起點。</p><p>　　一些聯(lián)合審計的例子已經(jīng)給定，八個最高審計機關(guān)審計“公約”關(guān)于保護波羅的海海洋環(huán)境（最高審計機關(guān)，丹麥，愛沙尼亞，芬蘭，拉脫維亞，立陶宛，波蘭，俄羅斯，瑞典，2001）。波蘭，捷克共和國和斯洛伐克共和國的最高審計機關(guān)聯(lián)合審核的實施和履行關(guān)于保護波羅的海（2002）注入河流的水質(zhì)污

21、染的任務(wù)。</p><p>　　其他八個主要是歐洲各國最高審計機關(guān)的審計協(xié)議污染海域的船舶（以色列，2001年，最高審計機關(guān)，荷蘭，2001年，最高審計機關(guān)，最高審計機關(guān)，英國，2002年，最高審計機關(guān)，2002年塞浦路斯，馬耳他，2003年，最高審計機關(guān);世2003年意大利，希臘，2003年，最高審計機關(guān)，最高審計機關(guān)法國和聯(lián)合報告，報告在準(zhǔn)備中）。三個斯堪的納維亞的最高審計機構(gòu)進行審核，“保護東北大西洋海洋環(huán)

22、境公約”，其中涉及海洋污染的陸基源（SAIS丹麥，冰島，挪威，2001）。</p><p>　　其他審計相關(guān)的一條河流，跨越（一）邊境（次）。五最高審計機關(guān)審計索菲亞公約“關(guān)于保護和可持續(xù)利用多瑙河（最高審計機關(guān)，保加利亞，2001年，最高審計機關(guān)，克羅地亞，2002年，最高審計機關(guān)，羅馬尼亞，2002年，斯洛伐克共和國和斯洛文尼亞最高審計機關(guān)報告：在準(zhǔn)備中），哥倫比亞和委內(nèi)瑞拉一起工作河上Ta'chir

23、a的計劃（最高審計機關(guān)，哥倫比亞，2002年）。</p><p>　　此外，發(fā)生其他形式的國際合作，如交換信息和審計方法，審計工作并不受一項國際協(xié)議（如在城市的飲用水供應(yīng)），或聯(lián)合培訓(xùn)課程和研討會上的一個共享主題合作。</p><p>　　若要稽核一個國際性的的環(huán)境協(xié)定，最高審計機關(guān)是之間的的合作不是一個先決條件條件。一些最高審計機關(guān)審核符合他們的政府與單獨的國際協(xié)定。一些例子：西加拿大審

24、計“巴塞爾公約”危險廢物（1997），“蒙特利爾議定書”和“維也納公約”臭氧損耗和氣候變化公約“（1998年），”生物多樣性公約“（1998年）。該美國最高審計機關(guān)（1999年）之經(jīng)審核在“京都議定書”上的氣候變化的。荷蘭最高審計機關(guān)以及審計（2002年）。新西蘭最高審計機關(guān)最高審核管理的多邊協(xié)議，涉及問責(zé)制和報告四個國際環(huán)境協(xié)定（2001年）。秘魯世審計野生動植物（2001）在瀕危物種國際貿(mào)易公約“。</p><p

25、>　　最近，在歐洲，亞洲，非洲，拉丁美洲和太平洋地區(qū)，區(qū)域環(huán)境審計工作組已經(jīng)成立。這些團體將繼續(xù)并加強在區(qū)域一級，最高審計機關(guān)之間的合作在不久的將來提供一個良好的平臺。</p><p><b>　　結(jié)論</b></p><p>　　主要結(jié)論可以得出的調(diào)查中表示如下。</p><p>　　●環(huán)境計劃和方案的制定，由政府在1993年和1996

26、年之間迅速增長?，F(xiàn)在，大多數(shù)國家都建立了某種形式的環(huán)保政策。然而，在許多國家的審計機構(gòu)，制定環(huán)境政策的清晰度是開放的改善。</p><p>　　●幾乎所有的最高審計機關(guān)可以應(yīng)用到所有的政府部門，包括環(huán)保部門的一般授權(quán)。大多數(shù)的最高審計機關(guān)有權(quán)做“事后”的審計，包括正?；蜇攧?wù)審計和績效審計或衡工量值式。</p><p>　　●最高審計機關(guān)越來越多的成為活躍在環(huán)境審計領(lǐng)域。經(jīng)過定量的增長，績效

27、審計轉(zhuǎn)變，從規(guī)律性被發(fā)現(xiàn)?，F(xiàn)在，一半以上的最高審計機關(guān)的審計工作環(huán)境審計是一項重大的常規(guī)部分。</p><p>　　●最高審計機關(guān)可以通過審計促進國際環(huán)境合作與國際環(huán)境的義務(wù)和承諾遵守本國政府。世界審計組織環(huán)境審計工作組要激發(fā)這種類型的審計，審核程序及國際協(xié)定的選擇提供了指引。此外，最高審計機關(guān)之間的合作是一個很好的方式來交流經(jīng)驗，互相學(xué)習(xí)。在過去的5年期間，一些進行聯(lián)合環(huán)境審計，主要是在區(qū)域一級。最近成立的區(qū)域

28、工作組將提供一個平臺，以繼續(xù)并加強最高審計機關(guān)之間的合作在不久的將來。</p><p>　　最高審計機關(guān)國際組織的工作組的調(diào)查結(jié)果，最高審計機關(guān)在環(huán)境審計的發(fā)展提供了一次見識。在未來，這將是有趣的，更詳細地評估對環(huán)境的貢獻，改善環(huán)境治理和政策表現(xiàn)的最高審計機關(guān)的審計工作。此外，這將是很有意思的評價最高審計機關(guān)的審計國際環(huán)境協(xié)定：聯(lián)合和協(xié)調(diào)審計項目的核數(shù)師的專業(yè)技能的貢獻之間的國際合作優(yōu)勢，與合作的質(zhì)量的影響審計。

29、這也將是有趣的，以評估是否聯(lián)合審計，國際環(huán)境合作做出更大的貢獻比僅僅通過最高審計機構(gòu)的單項審核。</p><p>　　Environmental Audit Activities of SAIs</p><p>　　A growing number of SAIs are active in the field of environmental auditing. Particularly

30、 for the period 1993–1996, the Working Group has detected a firm quantitative growth of environmental auditing activities. First, more SAIs have become active in this field. Second, active SAIs even have become more acti

31、ve: they have allocated a larger part of their audit resources to his type of work and published more environmental audit reports. Table 1 shows the average figures. However, here are large di</p><p>　　For t

32、he period 1996–1999, the results are not so easy to interpret. First, the number of SAIs active in the field of environmental auditing did not change much. The composition of the “active group” did not remain the same: s

33、ome SAIs entered, while other SAIs left the group. The amount of time spent on environmental auditing increased slightly. Second, however, the number of audit reports dropped slightly between 1996 and 1999. These figures

34、 might reflect a shift from quantity to quality. A sign</p><p>　　In 2000, 62 of the responding SAIs provided the Working Group with more detailed information on their work, published since 1997. In 1997–1999

35、, these 62 SAIs published 560 environmental audit reports. Of course these reports reflect a huge body of experience that can be used by other institutions. A bibliography of environmental audit reports is available on t

36、he Web site of the INTOSAI Working Group. Here this information is used to give some more insight into the content of the audit work of SA</p><p>　　Since 1997, a minority of the environmental audits are regu

37、larity audits only (87 of the 560 reports, 16%). Most audits are performance audits (304 of the 560 reports, 54%), or a combination of regularity and performance audits (169 of the 560 reports, 30%). As stated before, pe

38、rformance auditing is a broad concept. In practice, performance audits were very often concentrated on the implementation of environmental programs (264 of the 560 reports, 47%) and on compliance with national environmen

39、t</p><p>　　The environmental policies and programs include a wide range of environmental issues, and so do the audit reports. In the last survey, the most frequently audited issues were internal environmenta

40、l management by public authorities or departments (162 of 560 reports, 29%), fresh water (131 of 560 reports, 23%), waste (103 of 560 reports, 18%), and nature and recreation (102 of 560 reports, 18%). These most common

41、topics were roughly the same in all parts of the world. Besides these</p><p>　　topics, many other issues attracted the attention of SAIs: marine pollution, air pollution, climate change, soil pollution/conta

42、minated sites, the environment and human health, noise reduction, biodiversity and ecosystems management, agriculture, pesticides, disaster management and emergency preparedness, industrial pollution, minerals and natura

43、l resources, mining, fishery, transport, radioactivity, and so on.</p><p>　　To get a better understanding of the environmental audit work of SAIs in practice, about 50 reports related to water issues were ga

44、thered. The theme “water” was chosen because it was frequently audited by SAIs and it was the central theme for the exchange of experiences within the Working Group during the past 6 years. The reports collected all have

45、 a different focus.</p><p>　　Some deal with financial control and management issues, and have water issues as a secondary subject. Nearly all reports have water problems in society as a starting point, such

46、as the lack of access to clean water, or the pollution of rivers and lakes. To give an idea of the wide variation of environmental audits in practice, some examples are briefly described.</p><p>　　An example

47、 of a regularity audit is an audit focused on the operating funds of a wastewater treatment plant, conducted by the SAI of China (1999). It was found that the wastewater treatment fee level was low, and a rather big gap

48、existed between the subsidy the plant receives and the operating funds available to the plant. The Chinese SAI recommended that the fee for wastewater treatment should be raised step by step to ensure normal operation of

49、 the plant.</p><p>　　The following audits examples are performance audits.</p><p>　　Compliance to the Ramsar Convention on the Protection of Wetlands and two related European Union directives wa

50、s the subject of an audit by the SAI of The Netherlands (1999). In this audit, the implementation of national environmental programs related to wetlands was also included. The main findings were that The Netherlands had

51、drafted many plans for the management and restoration of wetlands, but in practice the implementation of these plans was often problematic or extremely slow. The internat</p><p>　　In the audit by the SAI of

52、Egypt on the prevention of pollution of the Nile River (2000), compliance to national rules and regulations was the most important aspect. The audit was focused on compliance with environmental rules, legislations, and s

53、tandards that safeguard</p><p>　　protection of the Nile River and other fresh waterways, the actions taken against violations, and the state of the sanitation system.</p><p>　　The SAI of France

54、did an audit on the pollution of water that is intended for human consumption (2002). The audit report illustrates the dilemma of sustainable development— balancing the economic and social objectives with the environment

55、al objectives. The main conclusion of the audit was that despite public expenditure since 1993, there has been no significant improvement</p><p>　　in water quality. The regulations designed to reconcile wate

56、r protection with agricultural activities</p><p>　　were ignored in favor of the latter. Moreover, the regulations were poorly monitored and were primarily designed to avert accidental pollution and not pollu

57、tion</p><p>　　from diffuse sources.</p><p>　　In 2000, the SAI of Mauritius conducted an audit on leakage in potable water storage and distribution systems. The reason for this audit was a large

58、volume of unaccounted-for-water (UFW) (around 47 percent of total production in 1998 and 1999) that led to the classification of Mauritius as a “water stressed” country. The decrease in rainfall in combination with an es

59、timated increase in the demand for potable water by more than 20% by 2010 poses an urgent problem for the country. This shortage ca</p><p>　　The last example is an audit of the SAI of the United States (2000

60、), which is focused on policy information. The SAI determined whether the information in the National Water Quality Inventory of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was reliable and representative of water-quality

61、conditions nationwide. Moreover, it reviewed available data to determine whether they were sufficient to allow state officials to make key management decisions regarding water quality. </p><p>　　It is not po

62、ssible to formulate a general conclusion on “water policy” based on these reports. The variation in subjects and audit questions is too wide. Of course, this had never been the purpose of these audits. Nevertheless, ther

63、e is one element that does seem to be a central problem of policy implementation and organization: the lack of sufficient and reliable information. Basic information on money spent, activities carried out, outputs delive

64、red, and impacts achieved, to be used for key ma</p><p>　　International Agreements and Cooperation Between SAIs</p><p>　　Environmental problems are often transboundary in nature. Examples of glo

65、bal environmental problems are global warming, depletion of the ozone layer, ocean pollution, and the exploitation of natural resources such as oil and gas or wood from tropical forests. Also, regional problems such as t

66、he water quality in major rivers, sustainable use of fish stocks, or the investigation</p><p>　　of environmental crimes often cross the borders of national states. Therefore, many countries seek internationa

67、l cooperation to solve environmental problems. This has resulted in a growing number of international agreements on environmental issues. Examples of international environmental agreements are the Kyoto Protocol on Clima

68、te Change, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Ships, the Basel </p><p>　　After ratification of the ag

69、reements by the member countries, national governments are responsible for implementing the international obligations in their national policy programs and legislation. SAIs can contribute to international environmental

70、cooperation by auditing the compliance of their national government with international obligations and commitments. </p><p>　　The INTOSAI Working Group on environmental auditing wants to stimulate this type

71、of audit and has provided guidelines for the audit process and the selection of international agreements. The Working Group has done this not only because the audit itself might be useful, but also because these audits p

72、rovide excellent possibilities for cooperation and the exchange of information between SAIs, to examine common issues, and to share ideas on specific audit topics.</p><p>　　The first INTOSAI Guidance deals w

73、ith the subject “How SAIs may co-operate on the audit of international environmental accords” (INTOSAI, 1998). Methodological questions were answered in the INTOSAI Guidance “Standards and guidelines on environmental aud

74、iting” (INTOSAI, 2001). The Working Group Paper “The audit of international environmental accords” (INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing, 2001b) deals with the risk-analysis, preceding the selection of an envi

75、ronmental agreement to aud</p><p>　　The majority of SAIs that responded to the last questionnaire indicated that they were interested in cooperation with another SAI to audit an international environmental a

76、greement in the near future (76%, N=102). A growing number of SAIs already have experience with cooperation in the field of environmental auditing and/or with auditing an environmental agreement. Several joint or coordin

77、ated audits were performed on marine pollution. Cooperation mainly occurred on a regional level, with a share</p><p>　　Some examples of joint audits are given. Eight SAIs audited the Convention on the Protec

78、tion of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea (SAIs of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, and Sweden, 2001). The SAIs of Poland, the Czech Republic, and the Slovak Republic jointly audited t

79、he implementation and fulfilment of tasks concerning the protection of water pollution of rivers emptying into the Baltic Sea (2002).</p><p>　　Eight other—mainly European—SAIs audited agreements on pollution

80、 of the sea by ships (SAI of Israel, 2001; SAI of The Netherlands, 2001; SAI of the United Kingdom, 2002; SAI of Cyprus, 2002; SAI of Malta, 2003; SAI of Greece, 2003; SAI of Italy, 2003; report of the SAI of France and

81、joint report, in preparation). Three Scandinavian SAIs performed an audit on the OSPAR Convention, which deals with pollution of the sea by land-based sources (SAIs of Denmark, Iceland, and Norway, 2001).</p><

82、p>　　Other audits were related to a river that crosses (a) border(s). Five SAIs audited the Sofia Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Use of the River Danube (SAI of Bulgaria, 2001; SAI of Croatia, 2002; SAI o

83、f Romania, 2002; reports of the SAIs of Slovak Republic and Slovenia: in preparation), and Colombia and Venezuela worked together on the River Ta´chira Project (SAI of Colombia, 2002). </p><p>　　Also, o

84、ther forms of international cooperation occurred, such as the exchange of information and audit methods, cooperation on audit work on a shared subject not regulated by an international agreement (such as drinking-water s

85、upplies in cities), or joint training courses and seminars.</p><p>　　To audit an international environmental agreement, cooperation between SAIs is not a prerequisite condition. Several SAIs audited the comp

86、liance of their government with international agreements alone. Some examples: The SAI of Canada audited the Basel Convention on Hazardous Waste (1997), the Montreal Protocol and the Vienna Convention on Ozone Depletion,

87、 and the Convention on Climate Change (1998), and the Convention on Biological Diversity (1998). The SAI of the United States (1999) audited t</p><p>　　Recently, in Europe, Asia, Africa, Latin America, and t

88、he Pacific, regional working groups on environmental auditing have been established. These groups will provide a good platform to continue and enhance the cooperation between SAIs at the regional level in the near future

89、.</p><p>　　Conclusions</p><p>　　The main conclusions that can be drawn from the survey among SAIs are as follows.</p><p>　　● The formulation of environmental plans and programs by g

90、overnments grew rapidly between 1993 and 1996. Now, most countries have established some form of environmental policy. However, according to the audit institutions in many countries, the clarity of the environmental poli

91、cy formulation is open to improvement.</p><p>　　● Nearly all SAIs have a general mandate that can be applied to all sectors of the government including the environmental sector. Most SAIs are entitled to do

92、“ex post” audits, including regularity or financial audits and performance audits or value for money audits.</p><p>　　● A growing number of SAIs became active in the field of environmental auditing. After a

93、quantitative growth, a shift from regularity to performance audits was noticed. Now, environmental auditing is a substantial and regular part of the audit work of more than half of the SAIs.</p><p>　　● SAIs

94、can contribute to international environmental cooperation by auditing the compliance of their national government with international environmental obligations and commitments. The INTOSAI Working Group on environmental a

95、uditing wants to stimulate this type of audit, and has provided guidelines for the audit process and the selection of international agreements. Moreover, cooperation between SAIs is a good way to exchange experiences and

96、 to learn from each other. During the last 5 years, s</p><p>　　The results of the survey of the INTOSAI Working Group provide a first insight in the development of environmental auditing by SAIs. In the futu

97、re it would be interesting to evaluate in greater detail the contribution of the environmental audit work of SAIs to the improvement of environmental governance and policy performance. Also, it would be interesting to ev